Ross v. Pentair Flow Technologies, LLC
Tony B. Ross |
Pentair Flow Technologies, LLC |
2:2019cv02690 |
November 7, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of Kansas |
Gwynne E Birzer |
Sam A Crow |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 7, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 CLERKS ORDER EXTENDING TIME until 01/14/2020 for Defendant Pentair Flow Technologies, LLC to answer or otherwise plead. Signed by deputy clerk on 01/02/2020. (ca) |
Filing 11 (PLEASE DISREGARD SEE DE 12) MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #10 Amended Complaint by Defendant Pentair Flow Technologies, LLC (referred to Magistrate Judge Gwynne E. Birzer) (McAtee, Carrie) Modified on 1/2/2020 (ca). |
Filing 10 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Tony B. Ross, filed by Tony B. Ross. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Gray, Gerald) |
Filing 9 MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT of #8 MOTION to Dismiss by Defendant Pentair Flow Technologies, LLC. (McAtee, Carrie) |
Filing 8 MOTION to Dismiss by Defendant Pentair Flow Technologies, LLC. (McAtee, Carrie) |
Filing 7 CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE With Local Rule 81.2 by Defendant Pentair Flow Technologies, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(McAtee, Carrie) |
Filing 6 CLERKS ORDER EXTENDING TIME until 11/28/2019 for Defendant Pentair Flow Technologies, LLC to answer or otherwise plead. Signed by deputy clerk on 11/8/2019. (ca) |
NOTICE OF JUDGE ASSIGNMENT: Case assigned to District Judge Sam A. Crow and Magistrate Judge Gwynne E. Birzer for all proceedings. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (ca) |
Filing 5 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE of Certificate of State-Court Filing by Pentair Flow Technologies, LLC (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(McAtee, Carrie) |
Filing 4 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Pentair Flow Technologies, LLC identifying Pentair plc as corporate parent . (McAtee, Carrie) |
Filing 3 DESIGNATION OF PLACE OF TRIAL filed by Defendant Pentair Flow Technologies, LLC - trial to be held in Kansas City. (McAtee, Carrie) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET by Defendant Pentair Flow Technologies, LLC. (McAtee, Carrie) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from District Court of Wyandotte County, Kansas, case number 2019-CV-000575 Trial location of Kansas City ( Filing fee $400, Internet Payment Receipt Number AKSDC-4975524.), filed by Pentair Flow Technologies, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)(McAtee, Carrie) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Ross v. Pentair Flow Technologies, LLC | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Tony B. Ross | |
Represented By: | Gerald Gray, II |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Pentair Flow Technologies, LLC | |
Represented By: | Carrie McAtee |
Represented By: | Kristen Aggeler Page |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.