Shields v. Credence Resource Management, LLC et al
Shields Dennis and Dennis Shields |
Credence Resource Management, LLC and AT&T Services, Inc. |
2:2019cv02694 |
November 11, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of Kansas |
Kenneth G Gale |
Julie A Robinson |
Consumer Credit |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 25, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE: Case reassigned to Magistrate Judge Kenneth G. Gale for all further pretrial proceedings. Magistrate Judge Teresa J. James no longer assigned to case - Party conflict AT&T. Signed by Magistrate Judge Teresa J. James on 11/25/2019. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.)(ck) |
SUMMONS ISSUED as to AT&T Services, Inc., Credence Resource Management, LLC. (issued to Attorney for service) (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry) (ca) |
NOTICE OF JUDGE ASSIGNMENT: Case assigned to Chief District Judge Julie A. Robinson and Magistrate Judge Teresa J. James for all proceedings. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (ca) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET by Plaintiff Shields Dennis. (Williston, Keith) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with trial location of Kansas City ( Filing fee $400, Internet Payment Receipt Number BKSDC-4977152.), filed by Shields Dennis. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C)(Williston, Keith) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.