Bina et al v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. et al
| Brian Bina and Dominque Moon |
| Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Allergan Sales, LLC, Warner Chilcott Company, LLC, Actavis LLC, Actavis Pharma, Inc., Actavis Laboratories FL, Inc., Actavis Totowa LLC, Actavis Elizabeth, LLC, Allergan Finance, LLC, Watson Laboratories, Inc., Teva Pharmaceutical Industries, Ltd., Allergan PLC and Allergan USA, Inc. |
| 2:2019cv02744 |
| December 9, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Kansas |
| Kenneth G Gale |
| Holly L Teeter |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 8, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| DOCKET ANNOTATION: Case electronically opened in Northern District of Ohio (20-45008). (hw) |
| Filing 2 CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO-127). Case electronically transferred to Northern District of Ohio (MDL 2804). ***Terminating Case. (hw) |
| Case transferred to District of Northern Ohio (MDL 2804).(hw) |
| NOTICE OF JUDGE ASSIGNMENT: Case assigned to District Judge Holly L. Teeter and Magistrate Judge Kenneth G. Gale for all proceedings. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (ca) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with trial location of Kansas City ( Filing fee $400, Internet Payment Receipt Number AKSDC-5002649.), filed by Dominque Moon, Brian Bina. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Rule 40.2 Designation)(Schnieders, Christopher) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
