Mills v. Quest Diagnostics Clinical Laboratories, Inc. et al
| Nicole Mills |
| Quest Diagnostics Clinical Laboratories, Inc., Talx UCM Services, Inc., Quest Diagnostics TB, Inc. and LabOne, LLC |
| 2:2020cv02042 |
| January 27, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Kansas |
| Kenneth G Gale |
| J Thomas Marten |
| Labor: Family and Medical Leave Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 24, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
INITIAL ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE: Scheduling Conference set for 5/12/2020 at 10:00 AM by telephone before Magistrate Judge Kenneth G. Gale. Counsel should call CONFERENCE LINE 1-888-363-4749 ACCESS CODE 5407703. Report of Parties Planning Meeting deadline 5/6/2020. Rule 26 Initial Disclosures Deadline set for 5/6/2020. See attached Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kenneth G. Gale on 3/24/20. (aw)
|
| Filing 11 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by LabOne, LLC, Quest Diagnostics Clinical Laboratories, Inc. identifying Quest Diagnostics Holdings Incorporated as corporate parent . (Bunck, Stacy) |
| Filing 10 Defendants' ANSWER to #9 Amended Complaint by LabOne, LLC, Quest Diagnostics Clinical Laboratories, Inc..(Bunck, Stacy) |
| Filing 9 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Quest Diagnostics Clinical Laboratories, Inc., LabOne, LLC d/b/a Quest Diagostics, filed by Nicole Mills.(Woodworth, Sophie) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER granting, for good cause shown, #7 Unopposed Motion for Leave to Amend Complaint #1 . Amended Complaint shall be filed, in form attached to motion, on or before March 19, 2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kenneth G. Gale on 3/5/20. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (df)
|
| Filing 7 Unopposed MOTION for Leave to Amend Complaint re #1 Complaint (attorney) by Plaintiff Nicole Mills (referred to Magistrate Judge Kenneth G. Gale) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Woodworth, Sophie) |
| Filing 6 CLERKS ORDER EXTENDING TIME until 3/5/2020 for Defendants Quest Diagnostics TB, Inc., Talx UCM Services, Inc., Quest Diagnostics Clinical Laboratories, Inc. to answer or otherwise plead. Signed by deputy clerk on 2/19/2020. (ca) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED -- personal service by Nicole Mills upon Talx UCM Services, Inc. served on 1/30/2020, answer due 2/20/2020 (Woodworth, Sophie) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED -- personal service by Nicole Mills upon Quest Diagnostics TB, Inc. served on 1/30/2020, answer due 2/20/2020 (Woodworth, Sophie) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED -- Personal Service by Nicole Mills upon Quest Diagnostics Clinical Laboratories, Inc. served on 1/30/2020, answer due 2/20/2020 (Woodworth, Sophie) |
| SUMMONS ISSUED as to Quest Diagnostics Clinical Laboratories, Inc., Quest Diagnostics TB, Inc., Talx UCM Services, Inc. (issued to Attorney for service) (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry) (ca) |
| NOTICE OF JUDGE ASSIGNMENT: Case assigned to District Judge J. Thomas Marten and Magistrate Judge Kenneth G. Gale for all proceedings. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (ca) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET by Plaintiff Nicole Mills. (Woodworth, Sophie) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with trial location of Kansas City ( Filing fee $400, Internet Payment Receipt Number AKSDC-5041776.), filed by Nicole Mills.(Woodworth, Sophie) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
