Neal v. Aramark Uniform & Career Apparel, LLC
Krista Neal |
Aramark Uniform & Career Apparel, LLC |
2:2020cv02077 |
February 24, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of Kansas |
John W Broomes |
Angel D Mitchell |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
28 U.S.C. ยง 451 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 16, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 ORDER granting #9 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice of Thomas F. Hurka for Aramark Uniform & Career Apparel, LLC pursuant to D. Kan. Rule 83.5.4 for purposes of this case only. Signed by Magistrate Judge Angel D. Mitchell on 4/7/2020. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (ctv) |
Filing 11 ORDER granting #10 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice of Gabriel Shechter for Aramark Uniform & Career Apparel, LLC pursuant to D. Kan. Rule 83.5.4 for purposes of this case only. Signed by Magistrate Judge Angel D. Mitchell on 4/7/2020. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (ctv) |
Filing 10 MOTION for attorney Gabriel Shechter to appear pro hac vice ( Pro hac vice fee $50, Internet Payment Receipt Number AKSDC-5109358.) by Defendant Aramark Uniform & Career Apparel, LLC (referred to Magistrate Judge Angel D. Mitchell) (Attachments: #1 Affidavit, #2 ECF Registration Form)(Mendoza, Elizabeth) |
Filing 9 MOTION for attorney Thomas Hurka to appear pro hac vice ( Pro hac vice fee $50, Internet Payment Receipt Number AKSDC-5109350.) by Defendant Aramark Uniform & Career Apparel, LLC (referred to Magistrate Judge Angel D. Mitchell) (Attachments: #1 Affidavit, #2 ECF Registration Form)(Mendoza, Elizabeth) |
Filing 8 INITIAL ORDER REGARDING PLANNING AND SCHEDULING: Scheduling Conference set for 5/19/2020 at 11:00 AM by phone (CONFERENCE LINE 1-888-363-4749; ACCESS CODE 3977627) before Magistrate Judge Angel D. Mitchell; Rule 26 Planning Conference Deadline 4/28/2020; Report of Parties Planning Meeting deadline 5/12/2020; Rule 26 Initial Disclosures Deadline set for 5/12/2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge Angel D. Mitchell on 4/1/2020. (ctv) |
Filing 7 ENTRY OF APPEARANCE by Rosalee Miller McNamara on behalf of Aramark Uniform & Career Apparel, LLC (McNamara, Rosalee) |
Filing 6 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Aramark Uniform & Career Apparel, LLC identifying Aramark as corporate parent . (Mendoza, Elizabeth) |
Filing 5 Defendant's Answer and Affirmative Defenses to Plaintiff's Complaint ANSWER to Complaint by Aramark Uniform & Career Apparel, LLC.(Mendoza, Elizabeth) |
Filing 4 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED -- Personal Service by Krista Neal upon Aramark Uniform & Career Apparel, LLC served on 2/26/2020, answer due 3/18/2020 (Holman, Kirk) |
SUMMONS ISSUED as to Aramark Uniform & Career Apparel, LLC. (issued to Attorney for service) (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry) (ca) |
Filing 3 ENTRY OF APPEARANCE by Aiman Dvorak on behalf of Krista Neal. (Dvorak, Aiman) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET by Plaintiff Krista Neal. (Holman, Kirk) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with trial location of Kansas City ( Filing fee $400, Internet Payment Receipt Number AKSDC-5069191.), filed by Krista Neal.(Holman, Kirk) |
NOTICE OF JUDGE ASSIGNMENT: Case assigned to District Judge John W. Broomes and Magistrate Judge Angel D. Mitchell for all proceedings. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (ca) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.