DeWalt v. Overland Park, Kansas, City of
| Rodney DeWalt |
| Overland Park, Kansas, City of |
| 2:2020cv02079 |
| February 25, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Kansas |
| James P O'Hara |
| Kathryn H Vratil |
| Other Fraud |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 17, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 JUDGMENT. IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that pursuant to the Memorandum And Order(Doc. #7) filed April 17, 2020, which sustained Defendant City Of Overland Park, Kansas' Motion To Dismiss (Doc. #3) filed March 13, 2020, this action is DISMISSED. The Court dismisses plaintiff's breach of contract claim (Count III) for failure to state a claim on which relief can be granted. The Court dismisses plaintiff's tort claims (Counts I, II, IV, V and VI) without prejudice for lack of jurisdiction. Signed by deputy clerk on 4/17/2020. (smc) |
Filing 7
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER sustaining #3 Defendant City Of Overland Park, Kansas' Motion To Dismiss. The Court dismisses plaintiff's breach of contract claim (Count III) for failure to state a claim on which relief can be granted. The Court dismisses plaintiff's tort claims (Counts I, II, IV, V and VI) without prejudice for lack of jurisdiction. Signed by District Judge Kathryn H. Vratil on 4/17/2020. (smc)
|
| Filing 6 REPLY TO RESPONSE TO MOTION by Defendant Overland Park, Kansas, City of re: #3 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM (Seck, Michael) |
| Filing 5 RESPONSE by Plaintiff Rodney DeWalt re #3 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM .(smc) |
| Filing 4 MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT of #3 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Defendant Overland Park, Kansas, City of (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2)(Seck, Michael) |
| Filing 3 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Defendant Overland Park, Kansas, City of (Seck, Michael) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET by Defendant City of Overland Park, Kansas. (Seck, Michael) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Johnson County District Court, case number 20CV665 Trial location of Kansas City ( Filing fee $400, Internet Payment Receipt Number AKSDC-5070614.), filed by City of Overland Park, Kansas. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D)(Seck, Michael) |
| NOTICE OF JUDGE ASSIGNMENT: Case assigned to District Judge Kathryn H. Vratil and Magistrate Judge James P. O'Hara for all proceedings. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (ca) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: DeWalt v. Overland Park, Kansas, City of | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Rodney DeWalt | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Overland Park, Kansas, City of | |
| Represented By: | Michael K. Seck |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
