Hawk v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc.
| Corina Hawk |
| Experian Information Solutions, Inc. |
| 2:2020cv02101 |
| March 5, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Kansas |
| Gwynne E Birzer |
| Kathryn H Vratil |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 3, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
ORDER granting #6 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer #1 Complaint. Experian Information Solutions, Inc. answer is now due 6/9/2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge Gwynne E. Birzer on 4/3/20. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (adc)
|
| Filing 7 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Experian Information Solutions, Inc. identifying Experian plc as corporate parent (Webb, Danne) |
| Filing 6 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by Defendant Experian Information Solutions, Inc. (referred to Magistrate Judge Gwynne E. Birzer) (Webb, Danne) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER granting #4 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice of Bryon Andrew Pike for Experian Information Solutions, Inc. pursuant to D. Kan. Rule 83.5.4 for purposes of this case only. Signed by Magistrate Judge Gwynne E. Birzer on 4/2/20. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (ala)
|
| Filing 4 MOTION for attorney Bryon Andrew Pike to appear pro hac vice ( Pro hac vice fee $50, Internet Payment Receipt Number AKSDC-5104195.) by Defendant Experian Information Solutions, Inc. (referred to Magistrate Judge Gwynne E. Birzer) (Attachments: #1 Affidavit, #2 ECF Registration Form)(Webb, Danne) |
| Filing 3 DESIGNATION OF PLACE OF TRIAL filed by Plaintiff Corina Hawk - trial to be held in Kansas City. (Esselman, Andrew) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET by Plaintiff Corina Hawk. (Esselman, Andrew) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with trial location of Kansas City ( Filing fee $400, Internet Payment Receipt Number AKSDC-5080734.), filed by Corina Hawk.(Esselman, Andrew) |
| SUMMONS ISSUED as to Experian Information Solutions, Inc. (issued to Attorney for service) (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry) (ca) |
| NOTICE OF JUDGE ASSIGNMENT: Case assigned to District Judge Kathryn H. Vratil and Magistrate Judge Gwynne E. Birzer for all proceedings. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (ca) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Hawk v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Corina Hawk | |
| Represented By: | Andrew M. Esselman |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Experian Information Solutions, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Bryon Andrew Pike |
| Represented By: | Danne Wayne Webb |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
