Staheli v. Mobilitie Investments III, LLC et al
| Staheli, Michael Staheli and Michael L. Staheli |
| Mobilitie Investments III, LLC, Stephen W. King, Max Electric, Max Electric, Inc. and Mobilitie Management, LLC |
| R.F. Fisher Electric Co., LLC and Michael L Staheli |
| 2:2020cv02122 |
| March 16, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Kansas |
| Gwynne E Birzer |
| Julie A Robinson |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 13, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 25
INITIAL ORDER REGARDING PLANNING AND SCHEDULING: Scheduling Conference set for 6/30/2020 at 10:00 AM by telephone before Magistrate Judge Gwynne E. Birzer. Participants shall dial into the conference call at 888-363-4749, enter access code 9686294#, and follow the prompts to join the call. Report of Parties Planning Conference and Rule 26 Initial Disclosures due 6/23/2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge Gwynne E. Birzer on 5/13/2020. (ala)
|
| Filing 24 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Mobilitie Management, LLC identifying none as corporate parent . (McCurdy, Megan) |
| Filing 23 ANSWER to #22 Answer to Complaint, Crossclaim , CROSSCLAIM against Max Electric, Inc., COUNTERCLAIM against R.F. Fisher Electric Co., LLC, Michael L Staheli by Mobilitie Management, LLC.(McCurdy, Megan) |
| Filing 22 CROSSCLAIM against Mobilitie Management, LLC by Max Electric, Inc..(Griffin, Stephen) (Modified on 5/7/2020 to remove Answer text; Answer to Complaint event was incorrectly selected. (heo) |
| Filing 21 ENTRY OF APPEARANCE by Megan A. McCurdy on behalf of Mobilitie Management, LLC. (McCurdy, Megan) |
|
Filing 20
ORDER granting #19 Plaintiff's Motion to Substitute Party Mobilitie Management, LLC in place of currently-named defendant Mobilitie Investments III, LLC as unopposed and for good cause shown. Signed by Magistrate Judge Gwynne E. Birzer on 5/6/20. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (adc)
|
| Filing 19 MOTION to Substitute Party by Plaintiff Michael L. Staheli (referred to Magistrate Judge Gwynne E. Birzer) (Mecham, Shane) |
|
Filing 18
ORDER finding as moot #11 Motion to Dismiss. In light of Plaintiff's Notice of Voluntary Dismissal of Defendant Stephen King, this motion is moot. Signed by Chief District Judge Julie A. Robinson on 5/1/2020. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (ams)
|
| Filing 17 RESPONSE by Plaintiff Michael L. Staheli re #11 MOTION to Dismiss (Mecham, Shane) |
| Filing 16 MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT of #15 MOTION to Dismiss Max Electric, Inc.'s Counterclaim by Counter Defendant Michael L. Staheli (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1-Order Appointing Receiver)(Mecham, Shane) |
| Filing 15 MOTION to Dismiss Max Electric, Inc.'s Counterclaim by Counter Defendant Michael L. Staheli (Mecham, Shane) |
| Filing 14 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal as to Stephen King by Michael L. Staheli (Mecham, Shane) |
| Filing 13 Plaintiff's ANSWER to #10 Counterclaim by Michael L. Staheli.(Mecham, Shane) |
| Filing 12 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Max Electric, Inc. identifying None as corporate parent . (Griffin, Stephen) |
| Filing 11 MOTION to Dismiss by Defendant Stephen W. King (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)(Griffin, Stephen) |
| Filing 10 Max Electric, Inc.'s ANSWER to Complaint , COUNTERCLAIM against Michael L. Staheli by Max Electric, Inc..(Griffin, Stephen) |
|
Filing 9
ORDER granting #8 Defendant Mobilitie Investments III, LLC's Motion for Extension of Time to file a responsivepleading to the Complaint #1 . Defendant Mobilitie Investments III, LLC answer due 5/8/2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge Gwynne E. Birzer on 4/9/20. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (adc)
|
| Filing 8 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint (attorney) by Defendant Mobilitie Investments III, LLC (referred to Magistrate Judge Gwynne E. Birzer) (Zluticky, Nicholas) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED -- Personal by Michael L. Staheli upon Stephen W. King served on 3/20/2020, answer due 4/10/2020 (Mecham, Shane) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED -- Personal by Michael L. Staheli upon Mobilitie Investments III, LLC served on 3/18/2020, answer due 4/8/2020 (Mecham, Shane) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED -- Personal by Michael L. Staheli upon Max Electric, Inc. served on 3/19/2020, answer due 4/9/2020 (Mecham, Shane) |
| SUMMONS ISSUED as to Stephen W. King, Max Electric, Mobilitie Investments III, LLC. (issued to Attorney for service) (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry) (ca) |
| NOTICE OF JUDGE ASSIGNMENT: Case assigned to Chief District Judge Julie A. Robinson and Magistrate Judge Gwynne E. Birzer for all proceedings. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (ca) |
| Filing 4 DESIGNATION OF PLACE OF TRIAL filed by Plaintiff Michael Staheli - trial to be held in Kansas City. (Mecham, Shane) |
| Filing 3 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Michael Staheli identifying None as corporate parent . (Mecham, Shane) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET by Plaintiff Michael Staheli. (Mecham, Shane) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with trial location of Kansas City ( Filing fee $400, Internet Payment Receipt Number AKSDC-5091326.), filed by Michael Staheli.(Mecham, Shane) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
