Garrison v. Walmart, Inc. et al
Robert Garrison |
Walmart, Inc. and Corey Sewell |
2:2020cv02138 |
March 23, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of Kansas |
James P O'Hara |
Kathryn H Vratil |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 20, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 19 AGREED PROTECTIVE ORDER granting #18 joint motion for protective order. Signed by Magistrate Judge James P. O'Hara on 5/20/2020. (amh) |
Filing 18 Joint MOTION for Protective Order by Defendant Walmart, Inc. (referred to Magistrate Judge James P. O'Hara) (Attachments: #1 Protective Order)(Wood, Mitchell) |
Filing 17 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE of Plaintiff's Rule 26(a)(1) Disclosures to Defendant by Robert Garrison. (DeMarea, Andrew) |
Filing 16 INITIAL ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE: Scheduling Conference set for 5/29/2020 at 11:00 AM by Telephone before Magistrate Judge James P. O'Hara. Report of Parties Planning Meeting deadline 5/19/2020. Rule 26 Initial Disclosures Deadline set for 5/19/2020. All parties and counsel participating in this phone conference are directed to dial the conference center line 888-363-4749, using access code 8914911 to join the conference. Signed by Magistrate Judge James P. O'Hara on 5/16/2020. (ss) |
Filing 15 ORDER overruling as moot #8 Defendant Corey Sewell'S Motion To Dismiss. Motion is moot in light of the filing of #12 Stipulation Of Voluntary Dismissal Of Separate Defendant Corey Sewell Without Prejudice. Signed by District Judge Kathryn H. Vratil on 4/8/2020. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (as) |
Filing 14 ENTRY OF APPEARANCE by Kathryn Ann Wright on behalf of All Defendants (Wright, Kathryn) |
Filing 13 ENTRY OF APPEARANCE by Mitchell E. Wood on behalf of All Defendants (Wood, Mitchell) |
Filing 12 STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL without prejudice of Separate Defendant Corey Sewell by Robert Garrison. (DeMarea, Andrew) |
Filing 11 DEMAND FOR TRIAL BY JURY by Robert Garrison. (DeMarea, Andrew) |
Filing 10 DESIGNATION OF PLACE OF TRIAL filed by Plaintiff Robert Garrison - trial to be held in Kansas City. (DeMarea, Andrew) |
Filing 9 MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT of #8 MOTION to Dismiss Party Corey Sewell by Defendant Corey Sewell (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)(Marsh, Michael) |
Filing 8 MOTION to Dismiss Party Corey Sewell by Defendant Corey Sewell (Marsh, Michael) |
Filing 7 ANSWER to Complaint by Walmart, Inc..(Marsh, Michael) |
NOTICE OF JUDGE ASSIGNMENT: Case assigned to District Judge Kathryn H. Vratil and Magistrate Judge James P. O'Hara for all proceedings. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (ca) |
Filing 6 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Walmart, Inc. identifying None as corporate parent (Marsh, Michael) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Filing of Notice of Removal by Corey Sewell, Walmart, Inc. (Marsh, Michael) |
Filing 4 ENTRY OF APPEARANCE by Michael J. Marsh on behalf of Corey Sewell, Walmart, Inc. (Marsh, Michael) |
Filing 3 ENTRY OF APPEARANCE by Lindsay Poehling Windham on behalf of Corey Sewell, Walmart, Inc. (Windham, Lindsay) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET by Defendants Corey Sewell, Walmart, Inc.. (Marsh, Michael) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from District Court of Johnson County, Kansas, case number 20CV01020 Trial location of Kansas City ( Filing fee $400, Internet Payment Receipt Number AKSDC-5097509.), filed by Corey Sewell, Walmart, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)(Marsh, Michael) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.