McLean v. United States Customs and Border Protection
| Thomas R. McLean |
| United States Customs and Border Protection |
| 2:2020cv02145 |
| March 26, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Kansas |
| John W Broomes |
| James P O'Hara |
| Other Statutes: Administrative Procedures Act/Review or Appeal of Agency Decision |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 551 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 28, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 Summons Returned Executed -- served by Certified Mail on United States Customs and Border Protection on 4/2/2020, answer due 6/1/2020. Summons served on United States Attorney. (heo) |
Filing 8
ORDER granting #7 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response re #3 MOTION for Summary Judgment. Response deadline 6/15/2020. Entered by District Judge John W. Broomes on 04/08/2020. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (jmr)
|
| Filing 7 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response as to #3 MOTION for Summary Judgment by Defendant United States Customs and Border Protection (Allman, Christopher) |
| MOTION REFERRAL to Magistrate Judge REMOVED as to: #7 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response as to #3 MOTION for Summary Judgment . The motion will be resolved by the District Judge.(ss) |
| Filing 6 CLERKS ORDER EXTENDING TIME until 6/15/2020 for Defendant United States Customs and Border Protection to answer or otherwise plead. Signed by deputy clerk on 4/3/2020. (ca) |
| Filing 5 DESIGNATION OF PLACE OF TRIAL filed by Plaintiff Thomas R. McLean - trial to be held in Kansas City. (smc) |
| Filing 4 DOCKET ANNOTATION: Plaintiff Thomas R. McLean is a registered pro se participant with ECF Notifications only. (gw) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Summary Judgment by Plaintiff Thomas R. McLean (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(ca) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET re #1 Complaint by Plaintiff Thomas R. McLean. (ca) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT (Summons Issued) with trial location of Kansas City, filed by Thomas R. McLean.(ca) |
| FILING FEE PAID: in the amount of $ 400, receipt number K4631058685. (ca) |
| NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY - Designation of place of trial is missing. The filing party/attorney is directed to correct the deficiency immediately. Mailed to Thomas R. McLean by regular mail.(This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (ca) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: McLean v. United States Customs and Border Protection | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: United States Customs and Border Protection | |
| Represented By: | Christopher Allman |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Thomas R. McLean | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
