Ivory v. USA ***DO NOT FILE IN THIS CASE. All filings to be made in criminal case 04-20044-01-KHV.
Petitioner: Andre Ivory
Respondent: USA
Case Number: 2:2020cv02156
Filed: March 27, 2020
Court: US District Court for the District of Kansas
Presiding Judge: Kathryn H Vratil
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Vacate Sentence
Cause of Action: 28:2255
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 27, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 27, 2020 DOCKET ANNOTATION: Do not file in this case. All future filings to be made in Criminal Case 04-20044-01-KHV. (hw)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ivory v. USA ***DO NOT FILE IN THIS CASE. All filings to be made in criminal case 04-20044-01-KHV.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: USA
Represented By: Tristram W. Hunt
Represented By: David C. Smith
Represented By: Scott C. Rask
Represented By: Jared S. Maag
Represented By: James A. Brown
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Andre Ivory
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?