Federal Trade Commission v. Superior Products International II, Inc. et al
| Federal Trade Commission |
| Superior Products International II, Inc. and Joseph E. Pritchett |
| 2:2020cv02366 |
| July 28, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Kansas |
| Gwynne E Birzer |
| Julie A Robinson |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 0045 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 22, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
MOTION for attorney Jonathan W. Ware to appear pro hac vice by Plaintiff Federal Trade Commission (referred to Magistrate Judge Gwynne E. Birzer) (Attachments: #1 Affidavit in Support, #2 Pro Hac Vice Electronic Filing Registration Filing Form)(Fleenor, Jon)
|
|
Filing 2
CIVIL COVER SHEET by Plaintiff Federal Trade Commission. (Fleenor, Jon)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT with trial location of Kansas City, filed by Federal Trade Commission. (Attachments: #1 Index of Exhibits, #2 Exhibit A: Super Therm Technical Data Sheet (3/1/19), #3 Exhibit B: Super Therm Brochure (2008), #4 Exhibit C: Bobvila.com Article by B. Hardy, #5 Exhibit D: Super Therm Brochure (2015))(Fleenor, Jon)
|
|
NOTICE OF JUDGE ASSIGNMENT: Case assigned to Chief District Judge Julie A. Robinson and Magistrate Judge Gwynne E. Birzer for all proceedings. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (ca)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
