Lillis v. Aspen American Insurance Company
| Patrick B Lillis |
| Aspen American Insurance Company |
| 2:2020cv02368 |
| July 29, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Kansas |
| Gwynne E Birzer |
| Eric F Melgren |
| Insurance |
| 12 U.S.C. ยง 635 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 24, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED -- Personal Service by Patrick B Lillis upon Aspen American Insurance Company served on 9/22/2020, answer due 10/13/2020 (Schirger, John) |
| SUMMONS ISSUED as to Aspen American Insurance Company. (issued to Attorney for service) (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry) (ca) |
| Filing 3 DESIGNATION OF PLACE OF TRIAL filed by Plaintiff Patrick B Lillis - trial to be held in Kansas City. (Schirger, John) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET by Plaintiff Patrick B Lillis. (Schirger, John) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with trial location of Kansas City ( Filing fee $400, Internet Payment Receipt Number AKSDC-5211527.), filed by Patrick B Lillis. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Policy)(Schirger, John) |
| NOTICE OF JUDGE ASSIGNMENT: Case assigned to District Judge Eric F. Melgren and Magistrate Judge Gwynne E. Birzer for all proceedings. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (ca) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
