Winkler v. Mars Wrigley Confectionery US, LLC
| J. Michael Winkler |
| Mars Wrigley Confectionery US, LLC |
| 2:2020cv02442 |
| September 10, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Kansas |
| John W Broomes |
| Teresa J James |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 4, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
ORDER granting #8 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice of David Randle Mulrine for Mars Wrigley Confectionery US, LLC pursuant to D. Kan. Rule 83.5.4 for purposes of this case only. Signed by Magistrate Judge Teresa J. James on 11/4/2020. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (hw)
|
|
Filing 11
ORDER granting #7 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice of Laura Bailey Gallagher for Mars Wrigley Confectionery US, LLC pursuant to D. Kan. Rule 83.5.4 for purposes of this case only. Signed by Magistrate Judge Teresa J. James on 11/4/2020. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (hw)
|
|
Filing 10
ORDER granting #6 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice of Thomas R. Davies for Mars Wrigley Confectionery US, LLC pursuant to D. Kan. Rule 83.5.4 for purposes of this case only. Signed by Magistrate Judge Teresa J. James on 11/4/2020. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (hw)
|
| Filing 9 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Mars Wrigley Confectionery US, LLC identifying Mars, Inc. as corporate parent . (Gragson, James) |
| Filing 8 MOTION for attorney David Mulrine to appear pro hac vice ( Pro hac vice fee $50, Internet Payment Receipt Number AKSDC-5310497.) by Defendant Mars Wrigley Confectionery US, LLC (referred to Magistrate Judge Teresa J. James) (Attachments: #1 Affidavit, #2 ECF Registration Form)(Gragson, James) |
| Filing 7 MOTION for attorney Laura Gallagher to appear pro hac vice ( Pro hac vice fee $50, Internet Payment Receipt Number AKSDC-5310486.) by Defendant Mars Wrigley Confectionery US, LLC (referred to Magistrate Judge Teresa J. James) (Attachments: #1 Affidavit, #2 ECF Registration Form)(Gragson, James) |
| Filing 6 MOTION for attorney Thomas Davies to appear pro hac vice ( Pro hac vice fee $50, Internet Payment Receipt Number AKSDC-5310471.) by Defendant Mars Wrigley Confectionery US, LLC (referred to Magistrate Judge Teresa J. James) (Attachments: #1 Affidavit, #2 ECF Registration Form)(Gragson, James) |
| Filing 5 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by J. Michael Winkler. Mars Wrigley Confectionery US, LLC waiver sent on 9/15/2020, answer due 11/16/2020. (Wunderlich, Joshua) |
| Filing 4 ENTRY OF APPEARANCE by Mary Katherine Paulus on behalf of J. Michael Winkler. (Paulus, Mary) |
| Filing 3 EXHIBIT(S) IN SUPPORT of #1 Complaint (attorney) by Plaintiff J. Michael Winkler (Exhibit 2). (Wunderlich, Joshua) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET by Plaintiff J. Michael Winkler. (Wunderlich, Joshua) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with trial location of Kansas City ( Filing fee $400, Internet Payment Receipt Number AKSDC-5253130.), filed by J. Michael Winkler. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(Wunderlich, Joshua) |
| NOTICE OF JUDGE ASSIGNMENT: Case assigned to District Judge John W. Broomes and Magistrate Judge Teresa J. James for all proceedings. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (ca) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
