General Casualty Company of Wisconsin v. RF Construction, Inc. d/b/a Benchmark Construction et al
General Casualty Company of Wisconsin |
Benchmark Construction, LLC, Anchor Companies, Inc., RF Construction, Inc. doing business as Benchmark Construction, Timothy Bruce and Amine Bruce |
2:2020cv02470 |
September 24, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of Kansas |
James P O'Hara |
Holly L Teeter |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 16, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 17 ORDER granting #16 defendants' second motion for extension of time. Defendants shall answer or otherwise respond to plaintiff's complaint by November 30, 2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge James P. O'Hara on 11/16/20. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (jc) |
Filing 16 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint (attorney),, by Defendants Anchor Companies, Inc., Benchmark Construction, LLC, Amine Bruce, Timothy Bruce, RF Construction, Inc. (referred to Magistrate Judge James P. O'Hara) (Barnes, Tom) |
Filing 15 ENTRY OF APPEARANCE by Tom R. Barnes, II on behalf of All Defendants (Barnes, Tom) |
Filing 14 ORDER granting #13 defendants' motion for extension of time. For good cause, defendants shall answer or otherwise respond to plaintiff's complaint by November 16, 2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge James P. O'Hara on 10/29/20. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (jc) |
NOTICE Re: Pro Se Mailing. Document 14 Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Answer, mailed to Timothy Bruce and Amine Bruce on 10/29/2020 by regular mail. (ca) |
Filing 13 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint by Defendants Amine Bruce, Timothy Bruce. (referred to Magistrate Judge James P. O'Hara) (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(smc) (Additional attachment(s) added on 10/29/2020: #2 Envelope) (ca). |
Filing 12 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED -- Personal by General Casualty Company of Wisconsin upon RF Construction, Inc. served on 10/12/2020, answer due 11/2/2020 (Mecham, Shane) |
Filing 11 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED -- Personal by General Casualty Company of Wisconsin upon Amine Bruce served on 10/12/2020, answer due 11/2/2020 (Mecham, Shane) |
Filing 10 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED -- Personal by General Casualty Company of Wisconsin upon Timothy Bruce served on 10/12/2020, answer due 11/2/2020 (Mecham, Shane) |
Filing 9 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED -- Personal by General Casualty Company of Wisconsin upon Benchmark Construction, LLC served on 10/12/2020, answer due 11/2/2020 (Mecham, Shane) |
Filing 8 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED -- Personal by General Casualty Company of Wisconsin upon Anchor Companies, Inc. served on 10/12/2020, answer due 11/2/2020 (Mecham, Shane) |
Filing 7 ORDER. On September 25, 2020, the Court ordered Plaintiff to show cause why this case should not be dismissed for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction #5 . Plaintiff has responded and adequately identified the citizenship of all parties, which are diverse under 28 U.S.C. 1332. Based on the information provided, the Court finds that Plaintiff has satisfied its burden to show why this case should not be dismissed for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. Signed by District Judge Holly L. Teeter on 9/29/2020. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.)(md) |
Filing 6 RESPONSE re #5 Order to Show Cause, by Plaintiff General Casualty Company of Wisconsin(Mecham, Shane) |
Filing 5 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE: Plaintiff ordered to SHOW CAUSE in writing on or before October 9, 2020, why this case should not be dismissed against Defendants without prejudice for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. Signed by District Judge Holly L. Teeter on 9/25/2020. (jal) |
Filing 4 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by General Casualty Company of Wisconsin identifying General Casualty Company of Wisconsin is a wholly owned subsidiary of QBE Regional Companies (N.A.), Inc. Its ultimate corporate parent is QBE Insurance Group Limited. There are no other subsidiaries of General Casualty Company of Wisconsin as corporate parent . (Mecham, Shane) |
Filing 3 DESIGNATION OF PLACE OF TRIAL filed by Plaintiff General Casualty Company of Wisconsin - trial to be held in Kansas City. (Mecham, Shane) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET by Plaintiff General Casualty Company of Wisconsin. (Mecham, Shane) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with trial location of Kansas City ( Filing fee $400, Internet Payment Receipt Number AKSDC-5268085.), filed by General Casualty Company of Wisconsin. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - PSU Ave Library Phase 3; Bond No. QSU000444, #2 Exhibit B - O.W. Fisher Chevrolet and Murphy Service Station; Bond No. QSU000452, #3 Exhibit C - Kansas State University Waters Hall Fire Sprinkler; Bond No. QSU000443, #4 Exhibit D - Raymore City Hall; Bond No. QSU000459, #5 Exhibit E - Region #2 Renovation and Security; Bond No. QSU000939, #6 Exhibit F - Osawatomie State Hospital Biddle Building Remodel; Bond No. QSU000438, #7 Exhibit G - Indemnity Agreement)(Mecham, Shane) |
SUMMONS ISSUED as to All Defendants. (issued to Attorney for service) (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry) (gw) |
NOTICE OF JUDGE ASSIGNMENT: Case assigned to District Judge Holly L. Teeter and Magistrate Judge James P. O'Hara for all proceedings. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (gw) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.