Chiarolanza v. Trans Union, LLC et al
Monette Chiarolanza |
Equifax Information Services, LLC, Trans Union, LLC, Experian Information Solutions, Inc. and Credit One Bank, N.A. |
2:2020cv02548 |
November 4, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of Kansas |
Teresa J James |
Kathryn H Vratil |
Consumer Credit |
15 U.S.C. § 1681 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 14, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
![]() |
Filing 19 DESIGNATION OF PLACE OF TRIAL filed by Defendant Trans Union, LLC - trial to be held in Kansas City. (Mouber, Bryan) |
Filing 18 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Trans Union, LLC identifying None as corporate parent . (Mouber, Bryan) |
Filing 17 ANSWER to Complaint and Defenses by Trans Union, LLC.(Mouber, Bryan) |
Filing 16 STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL as to Experian Information Solutions, Inc., only by Monette Chiarolanza. (Molner, Mark) |
Filing 15 NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT as to Experian Information Solutions, Inc., only by Monette Chiarolanza (Molner, Mark) |
Filing 14 ANSWER to Complaint by Experian Information Solutions, Inc..(Webb, Danne) |
Filing 13 NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT as to Credit One Bank and Equifax by Monette Chiarolanza (Molner, Mark) |
Filing 12 CLERKS ORDER EXTENDING TIME until 12/11/2020 for Defendant Credit One Bank, N.A. to answer or otherwise plead. Signed by deputy clerk on 11/24/2020. (ca) |
Filing 11 CLERKS ORDER EXTENDING TIME until 12/11/2020 for Defendant Trans Union, LLC to answer or otherwise plead. Signed by deputy clerk on 11/23/2020. (ca) |
![]() |
Filing 9 MOTION for attorney Samuel L. Lacy to appear pro hac vice ( Pro hac vice fee $50, Internet Payment Receipt Number AKSDC-5322971.) by Defendant Experian Information Solutions, Inc. (referred to Magistrate Judge Teresa J. James) (Attachments: #1 Affidavit, #2 ECF Registration Form)(Webb, Danne) |
Filing 8 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Experian Information Solutions, Inc. identifying Experian plc as corporate parent (Webb, Danne) |
Filing 7 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED by Monette Chiarolanza upon Experian Information Solutions, Inc. served on 11/10/2020, answer due 12/1/2020 (Molner, Mark) |
Filing 6 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED by Monette Chiarolanza upon Trans Union, LLC served on 11/6/2020, answer due 11/27/2020 (Molner, Mark) |
Filing 5 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED by Monette Chiarolanza upon Equifax Information Services, LLC served on 11/6/2020, answer due 11/27/2020 (Molner, Mark) |
Filing 4 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED by Monette Chiarolanza upon Credit One Bank, N.A. served on 11/6/2020, answer due 11/27/2020 (Molner, Mark) |
Filing 3 DESIGNATION OF PLACE OF TRIAL filed by Plaintiff Monette Chiarolanza - trial to be held in Kansas City. (Molner, Mark) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET by Plaintiff Monette Chiarolanza. (Molner, Mark) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with trial location of Kansas City ( Filing fee $400, Internet Payment Receipt Number AKSDC-5311415.), filed by Monette Chiarolanza.(Molner, Mark) |
SUMMONS ISSUED as to Credit One Bank, N.A., Equifax Information Services, LLC, Experian Information Solutions, Inc., Trans Union, LLC. (issued to Attorney for service) (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry) (ca) |
NOTICE OF JUDGE ASSIGNMENT: Case assigned to District Judge Kathryn H. Vratil and Magistrate Judge Teresa J. James for all proceedings. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (ca) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.