Mills v. State Corporation Commission of the State of Kansas
| Marvin L. Mills |
| State Corporation Commission of the State of Kansas, The, State Corporation Commission of the State of Kansas and Kansas Corporation Commission |
| 2:2020cv02626 |
| December 10, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Kansas |
| Teresa J James |
| Julie A Robinson |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 451 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 30, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
CLERKS ORDER EXTENDING TIME until 2/19/2021 for Defendant State Corporation Commission of the State of Kansas to answer or otherwise plead. Signed by deputy clerk on 1/25/2021. (lb)
|
|
SUMMONS ISSUED as to State Corporation Commission of the State of Kansas. (issued to Attorney for service) (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry) (kas)
|
|
NOTICE OF JUDGE ASSIGNMENT: Case assigned to Chief District Judge Julie A. Robinson and Magistrate Judge Teresa J. James for all proceedings. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (ca)
|
|
Filing 2
CIVIL COVER SHEET by Plaintiff Marvin L. Mills. (Benien, Ruth)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT with trial location of Kansas City ( Filing fee $402, Internet Payment Receipt Number AKSDC-5348612.), filed by Marvin L. Mills.(Benien, Ruth)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
