Gray v. U.S. Bancorp
| Bridgette Gray |
| U.S. Bancorp doing business as US Bank |
| 2:2021cv02162 |
| April 7, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Kansas |
| Kenneth G Gale |
| Eric F Melgren |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 4, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
INITIAL ORDER REGARDING PLANNING AND SCHEDULING: Scheduling Conference set for 7/20/2021 at 11:00 AM by Telephone KGG - CONFERENCE LINE 1-888-363-4749 ACCESS CODE 5407703 before Magistrate Judge Kenneth G. Gale. Report of Parties Planning Meeting deadline 7/8/2021. Rule 26 Initial Disclosures Deadline set for 7/8/2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kenneth G. Gale on 6/4/21. (cc)
|
| Filing 8 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by U.S. Bancorp identifying None as corporate parent . (Naeger, Erin) |
| Filing 7 ANSWER to Complaint by U.S. Bancorp.(Naeger, Erin) |
| Filing 6 ENTRY OF APPEARANCE by Erin M Naeger on behalf of U.S. Bancorp. (Naeger, Erin) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER granting, for good cause shown and as unopposed, #4 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer re #1 Complaint. Answer of Defendant U.S. Bancorp due on or before 6/3/2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kenneth G. Gale on 5/5/21. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (df)
|
| Filing 4 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer (Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint) by Defendant U.S. Bancorp (referred to Magistrate Judge Kenneth G. Gale) (Welch, Sara) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED -- Certified Mail by Bridgette Gray upon U.S. Bancorp served on 4/13/2021, answer due 5/4/2021 (Bruce, Robert) |
| SUMMONS ISSUED as to U.S. Bancorp. (issued to Attorney for service) (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry) (lb) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET by Plaintiff Bridgette Gray. (Doyle, Daniel) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with trial location of Kansas City ( Filing fee $402, Internet Payment Receipt Number AKSDC-5456046.), filed by Bridgette Gray.(Doyle, Daniel) |
| NOTICE OF JUDGE ASSIGNMENT: Case assigned to District Judge Eric F. Melgren and Magistrate Judge Kenneth G. Gale for all proceedings. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (lb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Gray v. U.S. Bancorp | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Bridgette Gray | |
| Represented By: | Daniel L. Doyle |
| Represented By: | Robert A. Bruce |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: U.S. Bancorp doing business as US Bank | |
| Represented By: | Sara E. Welch |
| Represented By: | Erin M Naeger |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
