Owens v. Kansas City Board of Public Utilities et al
| STERLING OWENS |
| UNIFIED GOVERNMENT OF WYANDOTTE COUNTY, KANSAS CITY, KANSAS, KANSAS BOARD OF PUBLIC UTILITIES, Kansas City Board of Public Utilities and Wyandotte County, Kansas, Unified Government of |
| 2:2021cv02185 |
| April 21, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Kansas |
| Angel D Mitchell |
| Kathryn H Vratil |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 14, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
ORDER sustaining, for substantially the reasons stated in the motion, #9 Unopposed Motion For Extension Of Time To Respond. Plaintiff is to file their response to #7 Defendant Kansas City Board Of Public Utilities' Motion To Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint on or before July 6, 2021. Signed by District Judge Kathryn H. Vratil on 6/15/2021. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (as)
|
| Filing 9 Unopposed MOTION for extension of time to Respond to Defendants Motion to Dismiss by Plaintiff Sterling Owens. (Braud, Bert) |
| MOTION REFERRAL to Magistrate Judge REMOVED as to: #9 Unopposed MOTION for extension of time to Respond to Defendants Motion to Dismiss. The motion will be resolved by the District Judge. (ks) |
| Filing 8 MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT of #7 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Defendants Kansas City Board of Public Utilities, Wyandotte County, Kansas, Unified Government of(Denk, Ryan) |
| Filing 7 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Defendants Kansas City Board of Public Utilities, Wyandotte County, Kansas, Unified Government of (Denk, Ryan) |
|
Filing 6
INITIAL ORDER REGARDING PLANNING AND SCHEDULING: Scheduling Conference set for 7/14/2021 at 10:00 AM in Telephone ADM - CONFERENCE LINE 1-888-363-4749 ACCESS CODE 3977627 before Magistrate Judge Angel D. Mitchell. Rule 26 Planning Conference Deadline 6/23/2021. Report of Parties Planning Meeting deadline 7/7/2021. Rule 26 Initial Disclosures Deadline set for 7/7/2021. Proposed Scheduling Order Deadline 7/7/2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge Angel D. Mitchell on 5/25/2021. (ht)
|
| Filing 5 CLERKS ORDER EXTENDING TIME until 6/1/2021 for Defendants Wyandotte County, Kansas, Unified Government of, Kansas City Board of Public Utilities to answer or otherwise plead. Signed by deputy clerk on 5/18/2021. (lb) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED -- Certified Mail by Sterling Owens upon Wyandotte County, Kansas, Unified Government of served on 4/28/2021, answer due 5/19/2021 (Braud, Bert) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED -- Certified Mail by Sterling Owens upon Kansas City Board of Public Utilities served on 4/28/2021, answer due 5/19/2021 (Braud, Bert) |
| NOTICE OF JUDGE ASSIGNMENT: Case assigned to District Judge Kathryn H. Vratil and Magistrate Judge Angel D. Mitchell for all proceedings. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (lb) |
| SUMMONS ISSUED as to Kansas City Board of Public Utilities, Wyandotte County, Kansas, Unified Government of. (issued to Attorney for service) (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry) (lb) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET by Plaintiff Sterling Owens. (Braud, Bert) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with trial location of Kansas City ( Filing fee $402, Internet Payment Receipt Number AKSDC-5468759.), filed by Sterling Owens. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit)(Braud, Bert) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
