Ponjavic v. United of Omaha Life Insurance Company et al
Nevenka Ponjavic |
InkCycle, Inc. Employee Welfare Plan and United of Omaha Life Insurance Company |
2:2021cv02189 |
April 26, 2021 |
US District Court for the District of Kansas |
Teresa J James |
John W Lungstrum |
Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1132 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 14, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED -- certified mail by Nevenka Ponjavic upon InkCycle, Inc. Employee Welfare Plan served on 5/11/2021, answer due 6/1/2021 (Ravis, Talia) |
Filing 2 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Nevenka Ponjavic. United of Omaha Life Insurance Company waiver sent on 5/6/2021, answer due 7/6/2021. (Ravis, Talia) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with trial location of Kansas City ( Filing fee $402, Internet Payment Receipt Number AKSDC-5471465.), filed by Nevenka Ponjavic. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Ravis, Talia) |
SUMMONS ISSUED as to InkCycle, Inc. Employee Welfare Plan, United of Omaha Life Insurance Company. (issued to Attorney for service) (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry) (lb) |
NOTICE OF JUDGE ASSIGNMENT: Case assigned to District Judge John W. Lungstrum and Magistrate Judge Teresa J. James for all proceedings. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (lb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.