Klein v. Gayhardt et al
Melvyn Klein |
Donald F Gayhardt, Chris Masto, Dale E. Williams, David M. Kirchheimer, Mike McKnight, Elizabeth Webster, Doug Rippel, Chad Faulkner, Andrew Frawley, Gillian Van Schaick, Karen Winterhof, William Baker, Roger W. Dean, CURO Group Holdings Corp. and Donald F. Gayhardt |
2:2021cv02308 |
July 15, 2021 |
US District Court for the District of Kansas |
Teresa J James |
Kathryn H Vratil |
Stockholders Suits |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 24, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 ORDER overruling #8 Joint Motion To Transfer Case To Judge Lungstrum. After consultation, Judge Lungstrum and the undersigned judge agree that in light of the history of the settled case, which is all a matter of record, re-assignment is not necessary to achieve substantive efficiencies. In addition, Judge Lungstrum's current docket is more than adequate for his status as a senior judge. Signed by District Judge Kathryn H. Vratil on 8/24/2021. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (as) |
Filing 9 MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT of #8 Joint MOTION to Transfer Case to Judge Lungstrum by Defendants William Baker, CURO Group Holdings Corp., Roger W. Dean, Chad Faulkner, Andrew Frawley, Donald F. Gayhardt, David M. Kirchheimer, Chris Masto, Mike McKnight, Doug Rippel, Gillian Van Schaick, Elizabeth Webster, Dale E. Williams, Karen Winterhof(Durone, Anthony) |
Filing 8 Joint MOTION to Transfer Case to Judge Lungstrum by Defendants William Baker, CURO Group Holdings Corp., Roger W. Dean, Chad Faulkner, Andrew Frawley, Donald F. Gayhardt, David M. Kirchheimer, Chris Masto, Mike McKnight, Doug Rippel, Gillian Van Schaick, Elizabeth Webster, Dale E. Williams, Karen Winterhof (Durone, Anthony) |
Filing 7 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Mike McKnight, Gillian Van Schaick, Chris Masto, Elizabeth Webster, Chad Faulkner, Karen Winterhof, Donald F. Gayhardt, Roger W. Dean, CURO Group Holdings Corp., Doug Rippel, Dale E. Williams, William Baker, Andrew Frawley, David M. Kirchheimer. All Defendants. (Durone, Anthony) |
Filing 6 ENTRY OF APPEARANCE by Anthony J. Durone on behalf of All Defendants. (Durone, Anthony) |
Filing 5 ORDER granting #4 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice of Thomas J. McKenna for Melvyn Klein pursuant to D. Kan. Rule 83.5.4 for purposes of this case only. Signed by Magistrate Judge Teresa J. James on 7/19/2021. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (ca) |
Filing 4 MOTION for attorney Thomas J McKenna to appear pro hac vice ( Pro hac vice fee $50, Internet Payment Receipt Number AKSDC-5539580.) by Plaintiff Melvyn Klein (referred to Magistrate Judge Teresa J. James) (Attachments: #1 ECF Registration Form McKenna ECR Registration, #2 Affidavit McKenna Pro Hac Affidavit Signature Page)(Taff, E.) |
Filing 3 DESIGNATION OF PLACE OF TRIAL filed by Plaintiff Melvyn Klein - trial to be held in Kansas City. (Taff, E.) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET by Plaintiff Melvyn Klein. (Taff, E.) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with trial location of Kansas City (Filing fee $402, Internet Payment Receipt Number AKSDC-5537355.), filed by Melvyn Klein. (Taff, E.) |
NOTICE OF JUDGE ASSIGNMENT: Case assigned to District Judge Kathryn H. Vratil and Magistrate Judge Teresa J. James for all proceedings. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (lb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.