Green v. McDonald's of Ottawa, Ltd, L.L.C., et al
| Anthony Green |
| McDonald's of Ottawa LTD, L.L.C. and McDonald's Corporation |
| 2:2021cv02361 |
| August 19, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Kansas |
| Daniel D Crabtree |
| Angel D Mitchell |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 451 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 6, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Anthony Green. McDonald's Corporation waiver sent on 9/1/2021, answer due 11/1/2021. (Liesen, Sarah) |
| Filing 4 AMENDED WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Anthony Green. (Liesen, Sarah) |
| Filing 3 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Anthony Green. McDonald's of Ottawa LTD, L.L.C. waiver sent on 9/1/2021, answer due 11/1/2021. (Liesen, Sarah) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET by Plaintiff Anthony Green. (Liesen, Sarah) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with trial location of Kansas City ( Filing fee $402, Internet Payment Receipt Number AKSDC-5566371.), filed by Anthony Green. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D)(Liesen, Sarah) |
| NOTICE OF JUDGE ASSIGNMENT: Case assigned to District Judge Daniel D. Crabtree and Magistrate Judge Angel D. Mitchell for all proceedings. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (kas) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
