de la Torre v. de la Torre
Leoncio de la Torre |
Rulber de la Torre |
2:2021cv02362 |
August 20, 2021 |
US District Court for the District of Kansas |
Gwynne E Birzer |
Kathryn H Vratil |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 8, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 16 RESPONSE by Plaintiff Leoncio de la Torre re #7 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim (Breckenridge, James) |
Filing 15 REPLY TO RESPONSE TO MOTION by Plaintiff Leoncio de la Torre re: #4 Motion to Appoint Receiver (Breckenridge, James) |
Filing 14 ORDER. The undersigned Magistrate Judge communicated to counsel, via letter dated September 21, 2021, regarding deferred scheduling of this case. Having received no response, the initial order and scheduling in this case shall be deferred pending ruling on the Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 7). IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Gwynne E. Birzer on 10/6/21. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.)(adc) |
Filing 13 NOTICE of Hearing. THIS IS AN OFFICIAL NOTICE FOR THIS HEARING. Motion Hearing on #4 Emergency Motion For Appointment Of Receiver and #7 Motion To Dismiss set for 11/3/2021 at 01:30 PM in KC Courtroom 440 (JWL/KHV) before District Judge Kathryn H. Vratil. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (as) |
Filing 12 ORDER granting #11 Motion for Leave to File Motion to Dismiss and Opposition to Emergency Motion to Appoint Receiver Out of Time. Plaintiff's Request For Clerk's Entry Of Default [Doc. #8 ] filed September 15, 2021 is DENIED as moot. See order additional information. Signed by District Judge Kathryn H. Vratil on 9/20/2021. (hw) |
Filing 11 MOTION FOR LEAVE to File Motion to Dismiss and Opposition to Emergency Motion to Appoint Receiver Out of Time by Defendant Rulber de la Torre (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2)(Gasper, Adam) |
MOTION REFERRAL to Magistrate Judge REMOVED as to: #11 MOTION FOR LEAVE to File Motion to Dismiss and Opposition to Emergency Motion to Appoint Receiver Out of Time . The motion will be resolved by the District Judge.(adc) |
Filing 10 RESPONSE to #4 Motion to Appoint Receiver by Defendant Rulber de la Torre. (Gasper, Adam) |
Filing 9 MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT of #7 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Defendant Rulber de la Torre(Gasper, Adam) |
Filing 8 APPLICATION FOR CLERKS ENTRY OF DEFAULT by Leoncio de la Torre. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Affidavit of J. Breckenridge)(Breckenridge, James) |
Filing 7 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Defendant Rulber de la Torre (Gasper, Adam) |
Filing 6 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED -- Personal Service by Leoncio de la Torre upon Rulber de la Torre served on 8/24/2021, answer due 9/14/2021 (Breckenridge, James) |
MOTION REFERRAL to Magistrate Judge REMOVED as to: #4 MOTION to Appoint Receiver . The motion will be resolved by the District Judge.(adc) |
Filing 5 Suggestions in Support of #4 Emergency Motion for Appointment of Receiver by Plaintiff Leoncio de la Torre. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit H, #7 Exhibit I, #8 Exhibit J, #9 Exhibit L)(Breckenridge, James) (Modified on 8/23/2021 to correct title; incorrect event used. (heo)) |
Filing 4 Emergency MOTION to Appoint Receiver by Plaintiff Leoncio de la Torre (Attachments: #1 Exhibit H, #2 Exhibit K, #3 Exhibit L)(Breckenridge, James) (Modified on 8/23/2021 to correct title. (heo)) |
Filing 3 DESIGNATION OF PLACE OF TRIAL filed by Plaintiff Leoncio de la Torre - trial to be held in Kansas City. (Breckenridge, James) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET by Plaintiff Leoncio de la Torre. (Breckenridge, James) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with trial location of Kansas City ( Filing fee $402, Internet Payment Receipt Number AKSDC-5567843.), filed by Leoncio de la Torre. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit H, #9 Exhibit J)(Breckenridge, James) |
MOTION REFERRAL to Magistrate Judge REMOVED as to: #5 Supplemental MOTION to Appoint Receiver . The motion will be resolved by the District Judge.(adc) |
SUMMONS ISSUED as to Rulber de la Torre. (issued to Attorney for service) (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry) (ca) |
NOTICE OF JUDGE ASSIGNMENT: Case assigned to District Judge Kathryn H. Vratil and Magistrate Judge Gwynne E. Birzer for all proceedings. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (kas) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: de la Torre v. de la Torre | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Leoncio de la Torre | |
Represented By: | Michael M. Tamburini |
Represented By: | James A. Breckenridge |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Rulber de la Torre | |
Represented By: | Adam J. Gasper |
Represented By: | Greg T. Spies |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.