Conner v. BNSF Railway Company
| Chris Conner |
| BNSF Railway Company |
| 2:2021cv02382 |
| September 1, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Kansas |
| John W Broomes |
| Kenneth G Gale |
| Labor: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 14, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Change of Scheduling Conference: THIS IS AN OFFICIAL NOTICE FOR THIS CHANGE OF DATE (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) Scheduling Conference reset for 11/12/2021 at 11:00 AM by Telephone (KGG - CONFERENCE LINE 1-888-363-4749 ACCESS CODE 5407703) before Magistrate Judge Kenneth G. Gale. (tl) |
Filing 7
INITIAL ORDER REGARDING PLANNING AND SCHEDULING: Scheduling Conference set for 11/9/2021 at 02:00 PM by Telephone (KGG - CONFERENCE LINE 1-888-363-4749 ACCESS CODE 5407703) before Magistrate Judge Kenneth G. Gale. Rule 26(f) Planning Conference Deadline 10/19/2021. Report of Parties Planning Meeting deadline 11/2/2021. Rule 26 Initial Disclosures Deadline set for 11/2/2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kenneth G. Gale on 10/5/21. (tl)
|
| Filing 6 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by BNSF Railway Company identifying BNSF as corporate parent . (Goman, Keith) |
| Filing 5 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by BNSF Railway Company.(Goman, Keith) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED -- Personal by Chris Conner upon BNSF Railway Company served on 9/14/2021, answer due 10/5/2021 (Groves, Steven) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET by Plaintiff Chris Conner. (Groves, Steven) |
| NOTICE OF JUDGE ASSIGNMENT: Case assigned to District Judge John W. Broomes and Magistrate Judge Kenneth G. Gale for all proceedings. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (lb) |
| SUMMONS ISSUED as to BNSF Railway Company. (issued to Attorney for service) (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry) (lb) |
| NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY - Designation of place of trial is missing. The filing party/attorney is directed to correct the deficiency immediately.(This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (lb) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET by Plaintiff Chris Conner. (Groves, Steven) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with trial location of Kansas City ( Filing fee $402, Internet Payment Receipt Number AKSDC-5578167.), filed by Chris Conner.(Groves, Steven) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Conner v. BNSF Railway Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Chris Conner | |
| Represented By: | Steven Lee Groves |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: BNSF Railway Company | |
| Represented By: | Keith Goman |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
