Ling v. Pharmacy Alternatives, LLC
| Deborah Ling |
| Pharmacy Alternatives, LLC |
| 2:2021cv02414 |
| September 22, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Kansas |
| Teresa J James |
| Holly L Teeter |
| Other Statutes: False Claims Act |
| 31 U.S.C. ยง 3730 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 4, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
ORDER granting #8 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response as to #6 MOTION TO DISMISS. Response deadline is on or before 11/29/2021. Signed by District Judge Holly L. Teeter on 11/17/2021. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (md)
|
|
Filing 8
MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response as to #6 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM , #7 Memorandum in Support of Motion by Plaintiff Deborah Ling. (Kistler, Mark)
|
|
MOTION REFERRAL to Magistrate Judge REMOVED as to: #8 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response as to #6 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM. The motion will be resolved by the District Judge.(md)
|
|
Filing 7
MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT of #6 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Defendant Pharmacy Alternatives, LLC(Summers, Curtis)
|
|
Filing 6
MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Defendant Pharmacy Alternatives, LLC (Summers, Curtis)
|
|
Filing 5
CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Pharmacy Alternatives, LLC identifying None as corporate parent (Summers, Curtis)
|
|
Filing 4
SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED -- Personal Service by Deborah Ling upon All Plaintiffs (Kistler, Mark)
|
|
Filing 3
CLERKS ORDER EXTENDING TIME until 10/29/2021 for Defendant Pharmacy Alternatives, LLC to answer or otherwise plead. Signed by deputy clerk on 10/12/2021. (lb)
|
|
Filing 2
CIVIL COVER SHEET by Plaintiff Deborah Ling. (Kistler, Mark)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT with trial location of Kansas City ( Filing fee $402, Internet Payment Receipt Number AKSDC-5593113.), filed by Deborah Ling.(Kistler, Mark)
|
|
SUMMONS ISSUED as to Pharmacy Alternatives, LLC. (issued to Attorney for service) (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry) (lb)
|
|
NOTICE OF JUDGE ASSIGNMENT: Case assigned to District Judge Holly L. Teeter and Magistrate Judge Teresa J. James for all proceedings. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (lb)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Ling v. Pharmacy Alternatives, LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Deborah Ling | |
| Represented By: | Mark A. Kistler |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Pharmacy Alternatives, LLC | |
| Represented By: | Curtis R. Summers |
| Represented By: | Dylan M. Long |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
