Shalo v. Midland Credit Management, Inc.
Philomina Shalo |
Midland Credit Management, Inc. |
2:2021cv02433 |
September 30, 2021 |
US District Court for the District of Kansas |
Gwynne E Birzer |
Daniel D Crabtree |
Consumer Credit |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 19, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 INITIAL ORDER REGARDING PLANNING AND SCHEDULING: Scheduling Conference set for 1/25/2022 at 11:00 AM by telephone before Magistrate Judge Gwynne E. Birzer. Participants shall dial into the conference call at 888-363-4749, enter access code 9686294#, and follow the prompts to join the call. Report of Parties Planning Conference and Rule 26 Initial Disclosures due 1/18/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Gwynne E. Birzer on 21-2433. (ala) |
Filing 11 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Midland Credit Management, Inc. identifying Encore Capital Group, Inc. as corporate parent . (Dickinson, Joshua) |
Filing 10 Defendant's ANSWER to Complaint and Affirmative Defenses by Midland Credit Management, Inc..(Dickinson, Joshua) |
Filing 9 ORDER granting #8 Defendant's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Midland Credit Management, Inc. shall answer or otherwise plead on or before 11/17/2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge Gwynne E. Birzer on 11/12/21. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (ala) |
Filing 8 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint (attorney) by Defendant Midland Credit Management, Inc. (referred to Magistrate Judge Gwynne E. Birzer) (Dickinson, Joshua) |
Filing 7 CLERKS ORDER EXTENDING TIME until 11/10/2021 for Defendant Midland Credit Management, Inc. to answer or otherwise plead. Signed by deputy clerk on 10/27/2021. (lb) |
Filing 6 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED -- personal by Philomina Shalo upon Midland Credit Management, Inc. served on 10/6/2021, answer due 10/27/2021 (Crump, James) |
Filing 5 ORDER granting #4 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice of David J. Philipps, Mary E. Philipps for Philomina Shalo pursuant to D. Kan. Rule 83.5.4 for purposes of this case only. Signed by Magistrate Judge Gwynne E. Birzer on 9/30/21. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (adc) |
Filing 4 MOTION for attorney David Philipps and Mary Philipps to appear pro hac vice ( Pro hac vice fee $100, Internet Payment Receipt Number AKSDC-5600425.) by Plaintiff Philomina Shalo (Attachments: #1 Affidavit of Movant David J. Philipps, #2 ECF Registration Form of David J. Philipps, #3 Affidavit of Movant Mary E. Philipps, #4 ECF Registration Form of Mary E. Philipps)(Crump, James) |
Filing 3 DESIGNATION OF PLACE OF TRIAL filed by Plaintiff Philomina Shalo - trial to be held in Kansas City. (Crump, James) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET by Plaintiff Philomina Shalo. (Crump, James) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with trial location of Kansas City ( Filing fee $402, Internet Payment Receipt Number AKSDC-5600367.), filed by Philomina Shalo. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C)(Crump, James) |
NOTICE OF JUDGE ASSIGNMENT: Case assigned to District Judge Daniel D. Crabtree and Magistrate Judge Gwynne E. Birzer for all proceedings. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (lb) |
SUMMONS ISSUED as to Midland Credit Management, Inc. (issued to Attorney for service) (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry) (lb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.