Mitchell v. Aerospace Systems & Components, Inc. et al
Megan Mitchell |
Aerospace Systems & Components, Inc., Eddie Morrison and Vicki Hickman |
2:2021cv02468 |
October 18, 2021 |
US District Court for the District of Kansas |
Toby Crouse |
James P O'Hara |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 30, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Megan Mitchell. Eddie Morrison waiver sent on 10/28/2021, answer due 12/27/2021. (Reavey, Patrick) |
Filing 4 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Megan Mitchell. Vicki Hickman waiver sent on 10/28/2021, answer due 12/27/2021. (Reavey, Patrick) |
Filing 3 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Megan Mitchell. Aerospace Systems & Components, Inc. waiver sent on 10/28/2021, answer due 12/27/2021. (Reavey, Patrick) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET by Plaintiff Megan Mitchell. (Reavey, Patrick) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with trial location of Kansas City ( Filing fee $402, Internet Payment Receipt Number AKSDC-5612864.), filed by Megan Mitchell. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E)(Reavey, Patrick) |
NOTICE OF JUDGE ASSIGNMENT: Case assigned to District Judge Toby Crouse and Magistrate Judge James P. O'Hara for all proceedings. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (lb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.