Jose Pepper's Restaurants, LLC et al v. Zurich American Insurance Company
| Jose Pepper's Restaurants, LLC and Edward J. Gieselman |
| Zurich American Insurance Company |
| 2:2021cv02506 |
| November 2, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Kansas |
| Gwynne E Birzer |
| Toby Crouse |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 13, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 21
ORDER granting #20 Plaintiffs' Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response as to #18 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM (Motion to Dismiss Counts II and III of Plaintiffs' Amended Complaint) . Response deadline 1/21/2022. Signed by District Judge Toby Crouse on 12/27/21. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (ta)
|
| Filing 20 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response as to #18 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM (Motion to Dismiss Counts II and III of Plaintiffs' Amended Complaint) by Plaintiffs Edward J. Gieselman, Jose Pepper's Restaurants, LLC. (Johnson, Shannon) |
| MOTION REFERRAL to Magistrate Judge REMOVED as to: #20 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response as to #18 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM (Motion to Dismiss Counts II and III of Plaintiffs' Amended Complaint). The motion will be resolved by the District Judge. (kf) |
| Filing 19 MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT of #18 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM (Motion to Dismiss Counts II and III of Plaintiffs' Amended Complaint) by Defendant Zurich American Insurance Company(Fields, Larry) |
| Filing 18 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM (Motion to Dismiss Counts II and III of Plaintiffs' Amended Complaint) by Defendant Zurich American Insurance Company (Fields, Larry) |
| Filing 17 CLERKS ORDER EXTENDING TIME until 12/22/2021 for Defendant Zurich American Insurance Company to answer or otherwise plead. Signed by deputy clerk on 12/6/2021. (kas) |
|
Filing 16
ORDER ENTERED: Defendant has shown good cause why this matter should not be remanded for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. Re #9 Order to Show Cause. Signed by District Judge Toby Crouse on 11/29/21. (msb)
|
| Filing 15 RESPONSE re #9 Order to Show Cause by Defendant Zurich American Insurance Company(Webster, Meredith) |
| Filing 14 RESPONSE by Plaintiffs Edward J. Gieselman, Jose Pepper's Restaurants, LLC re #6 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim (Johnson, Shannon) |
| Filing 13 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Zurich American Insurance Company, filed by Jose Pepper's Restaurants, LLC, Edward J. Gieselman.(Johnson, Shannon) |
| Filing 12 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Jose Pepper's Restaurants, LLC identifying None as corporate parent (Johnson, Shannon) |
| Filing 11 ENTRY OF APPEARANCE by Julie E. Parisi on behalf of Edward J. Gieselman, Jose Pepper's Restaurants, LLC (Parisi, Julie) |
| Filing 10 ENTRY OF APPEARANCE by Shannon Cohorst Johnson on behalf of Edward J. Gieselman, Jose Pepper's Restaurants, LLC (Johnson, Shannon) |
|
Filing 9
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE: Defendant is directed to show cause within 14 days why the Court should not remand this action for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. 1332. Signed by District Judge Toby Crouse on 11/19/21. (msb)
|
|
Filing 8
INITIAL ORDER REGARDING PLANNING AND SCHEDULING: Scheduling Conference set for 1/12/2022 at 10:00 AM by telephone before Magistrate Judge Gwynne E. Birzer. Participants shall dial into the conference call at 888-363-4749, enter access code 9686294#, and follow the prompts to join the call. Report of Parties Planning Conference and Rule 26 Initial Disclosures due 1/5/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Gwynne E. Birzer on 11/10/21. (ala)
|
| Filing 7 MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT of #6 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM (Motion to Dismiss Counts II and III of Plaintiffs' Complaint) by Defendant Zurich American Insurance Company(Fields, Larry) |
| Filing 6 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM (Motion to Dismiss Counts II and III of Plaintiffs' Complaint) by Defendant Zurich American Insurance Company (Fields, Larry) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Proof of Service of Defendant's Notice of Removal by Zurich American Insurance Company (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Notice of Filing Notice of Removal in JOCO)(Webster, Meredith) |
| Filing 4 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Zurich American Insurance Company identifying Zurich Insurance Group Ltd. as corporate parent . (Webster, Meredith) |
| Filing 3 DESIGNATION OF PLACE OF TRIAL filed by Defendant Zurich American Insurance Company - trial to be held in Kansas City. (Webster, Meredith) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET by Defendant Zurich American Insurance Company. (Webster, Meredith) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from District Court of Johnson County, Kansas, case number 21CV04812 Trial location of Kansas City ( Filing fee $402, Internet Payment Receipt Number AKSDC-5625878.), filed by Zurich American Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - District Court of Johnson County, Kansas File, #2 Exhibit B - Copy of Notice of Filing Notice of Removal, #3 Exhibit C - Declaration of Gabriella Garofalo-Johnson)(Webster, Meredith) |
| NOTICE OF JUDGE ASSIGNMENT: Case assigned to District Judge Toby Crouse and Magistrate Judge Gwynne E. Birzer for all proceedings. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (lb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
