Robertson v. VVF Intervest, LLC et al
| Marlon Robertson |
| VVF Intervest, LLC, VVF Kansas, LLC and VVF Kansas Services, LLC |
| 2:2021cv02507 |
| November 2, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Kansas |
| Kenneth G Gale |
| Eric F Melgren |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 3, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 DESIGNATION OF PLACE OF TRIAL filed by Plaintiff Marlon Robertson - trial to be held in Kansas City. (Osman, Matthew) |
| NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY - Designation of place of trial is missing. The filing party/attorney is directed to correct the deficiency immediately.(This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (lb) |
| NOTICE OF JUDGE ASSIGNMENT: Case assigned to District Judge Eric F. Melgren and Magistrate Judge Kenneth G. Gale for all proceedings. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (lb) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET by Plaintiff Marlon Robertson. (Osman, Matthew) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with trial location of Kansas City ( Filing fee $402, Internet Payment Receipt Number AKSDC-5626286.), filed by Marlon Robertson. (Attachments: #1 Ex. 1 - Robertson CTJ, #2 Ex. 2 - 2020 VVF Kansas Annual Report, #3 Ex. 3 - VVF Kansas Services Annual Report)(Osman, Matthew) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
