Consumer Financial Protection Bureau v. Integrity Advance, LLC et al
Case Number: 2:2021mc00206
Filed: July 30, 2021
Court: US District Court for the District of Kansas
Office: Kansas City Office
Nature of Suit: Other
Cause of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 1, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 221 ORDER REGARDING REQUESTS FOR HEARINGS ON WRITS OF GARNISHMENT, finding as moot 193 James Carnes' First Motion for Hearing; and denying 218 James Carnes' Second Motion for Hearing. Signed by Magistrate Judge Teresa J. James on 5/1/2024. A copy of this Order sent to Garnishee Grushko and Mittman PC by regular mail and email. (byk)
February 12, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 180 ORDER PERMITTING REDACTION granting 175 Motion to Seal or Redact. Defendant James Carnes' request that the provisionally sealed 172 Application for Writ of Garnishment remain under seal and that a redacted version be filed in the public re cord is granted. The three references to the identity of Carnes' client in the caption and third paragraph shall be redacted from the Application. Counsel who provisionally filed the Application under seal is directed to file the redacted docume nt in the public record forthwith using the Redacted Document event. The provisionally sealed document will remain sealed, and the clerk is directed to remove the provisional designation from the 172 Application. Signed by Magistrate Judge Teresa J. James on 2/12/2024. (byk)
December 11, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 167 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER finding moot in part and denying without prejudice in part 128 Melissa Carnes' First Motion to Quash; denying without prejudice 159 Melissa Carnes' Second Motion to Quash. Morgan Stanley Accounts 3581, 3717, and 92 04 and Country Club Bank Account 5420 shall remain frozen until such time as a final determination is made in the Fraudulent Transfer Action with respect to the accounts at issue or such time as further discovery warrants further consideration of whether any or all of the accounts at issue should be released. Signed by Magistrate Judge Teresa J. James on 12/11/2023. (byk)
July 15, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 56 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying 44 Defendant's Motion to Quash and for Protective Order filed by Defendant and Judgment-Debtor James R. Carnes and denying 48 Nonparties Melissa C. Carnes Revocable Trust and Melissa C. Carnes' Motion to Quash. Signed by Magistrate Judge Teresa J. James on 7/15/2022. (ts)
March 1, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 41 AGREED PROTECTIVE ORDER. The court finds good cause to enter the order submitted by the parties. Signed by Magistrate Judge James P. O'Hara on 3/1/2022. (amh)
February 1, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 39 ORDER granting 32 Motion to Compel. Signed by Magistrate Judge James P. O'Hara on 2/1/2022. (srj)
July 30, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 21 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - It is ordered that Consumer Financial Protection Bureau's petition seeking an order and judgment enforcing its own Final Order of January 11, 2021 1 , that imposed obligations on respondents Integrity Advance, LLC andJames Carnes is hereby granted; respondents are ordered to comply with the Final Order, and judgment shall be entered accordingly. Signed by District Judge John W. Lungstrum on 07/30/2021. (ses)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Consumer Financial Protection Bureau v. Integrity Advance, LLC et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?