Tonkin v. Equifax Information Services, LLC et al
| Kimberly Tonkin |
| Equifax Information Services, LLC, Trans Union, LLC and Capitol Federal Financial, Inc. |
| 2:2022cv02129 |
| April 7, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Kansas |
| Kenneth G Gale |
| Eric F Melgren |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 3, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 MOTION to Substitute Party by Defendant Capitol Federal Financial, Inc. (referred to Magistrate Judge Kenneth G. Gale) (Beheler, Richard) |
| Filing 12 ANSWER to Complaint by Capitol Federal Financial, Inc..(Beheler, Richard) |
| Filing 11 ANSWER to Complaint to Plaintiff's Complaint and Affirmative and Other Defenses by Equifax Information Services, LLC. (Armstrong, Nicolette) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT with Defendant Trans Union LLC by Kimberly Tonkin (Addleman, Thomas) |
Filing 9
ORDER granting, for good cause shown and as unopposed, #8 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint. Responsive pleading of Capitol Federal Financial, Inc. due on or before 6/3/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kenneth G. Gale on 5/11/22. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (df)
|
| Filing 8 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint (attorney) by Defendant Capitol Federal Financial, Inc. (referred to Magistrate Judge Kenneth G. Gale) (Beheler, Richard) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER granting #6 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint. Answer or response of Trans Union, LLC due on or before 5/25/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kenneth G. Gale on 5/4/22. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (df)
|
| Filing 6 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer TransUnion by Plaintiff Kimberly Tonkin (referred to Magistrate Judge Kenneth G. Gale) (Addleman, Thomas) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER granting, for good cause shown, #3 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond to #1 Complaint. Answer or response of Equifax Information Services, LLC due on or before 5/25/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kenneth G. Gale on 5/3/22. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (df)
|
| Filing 4 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Equifax Information Services, LLC identifying Equifax Inc. as corporate parent . (Armstrong, Nicolette) |
| Filing 3 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint by Defendant Equifax Information Services, LLC (referred to Magistrate Judge Kenneth G. Gale) (Armstrong, Nicolette) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET by Plaintiff Kimberly Tonkin. (Addleman, Thomas) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with trial location of Kansas City (Filing fee $402, Internet Payment Receipt Number AKSDC-5752529.), filed by Kimberly Tonkin.(Addleman, Thomas) |
| SUMMONS ISSUED as to Capitol Federal Financial, Inc., Equifax Information Services, LLC, Trans Union, LLC. (issued to Attorney for service) (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry) (lb) |
| NOTICE OF JUDGE ASSIGNMENT: Case assigned to Chief District Judge Eric F. Melgren and Magistrate Judge Kenneth G. Gale for all proceedings. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (lb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
