Johnson v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
Plaintiff: James E. Johnson
Defendant: Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
Interested Party: Social Security Regional Administrator
Case Number: 2:2022cv02155
Filed: April 25, 2022
Court: US District Court for the District of Kansas
Presiding Judge: Sam A Crow
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 427 Social Security Benefits
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 26, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 26, 2022 Filing 8 JUDGMENT ENTERED: Case dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Deputy Clerk on 5/26/22. (msb)
May 26, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER Dismissing Case without prejudice. See order for details. Signed by U.S. District Senior Judge Sam A. Crow on 5/26/22. (msb)
May 26, 2022 NOTICE of Pro Se Mailing: Documents #7 Order & #8 Judgment mailed to James E. Johnson on 5/26/2022 by regular mail. (msb)
May 23, 2022 Filing 6 RESPONSE re #5 Order to Show Cause by Plaintiff James E. Johnson. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(ca)
April 27, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER: Plaintiff is directed to show cause no later than May 27, 2022 why this case should not be dismissed for failure to state a claim which this court has jurisdiction to consider. The court shall deny plaintiff's motion for appointment of counsel #4 at this time as it appears that plaintiff has not alleged a case over which this court has jurisdiction. Show Cause Response due by 5/27/2022. Signed by District Judge Sam A. Crow on April 27, 2022. Mailed to pro se party James E. Johnson by regular mail. (mls) Signed by District Judge Sam A. Crow on April 27, 2022. (mls)
April 25, 2022 Filing 4 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Plaintiff James E. Johnson. (lb)
April 25, 2022 Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis NOTE - Access to document is restricted pursuant to the courts privacy policy by Plaintiff James E. Johnson. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit) (lb)
April 25, 2022 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET re #1 Complaint, by Plaintiff James E. Johnson. (lb)
April 25, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT with trial location of Kansas City, filed by James E. Johnson. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7, #8 Exhibit 8, #9 Exhibit 9, #10 Exhibit 10, #11 Exhibit 11) (lb)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Johnson v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: James E. Johnson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: Social Security Regional Administrator
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?