Central Bank of the Midwest v. Nueterra Capital, LLC
Plaintiff: Central Bank of the Midwest
Defendant: Nueterra Capital, LLC
Case Number: 2:2022cv02218
Filed: June 9, 2022
Court: US District Court for the District of Kansas
Presiding Judge: John W Broomes
Referring Judge: Rachel E Schwartz
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 21, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 3, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 14 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Nueterra Capital, LLC identifying Mayhew Properties, LLC and Tasset Family, LLC as corporate parent . (Stromberg, Matthew)
August 3, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 13 CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE by Defendant Nueterra Capital, LLC . (Stromberg, Matthew)
August 3, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ANSWER to Complaint by Nueterra Capital, LLC.(Stromberg, Matthew)
August 3, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 11 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE of Plaintiff Central Bank of the Midwest's Initial Rule 26(a)(1) Disclosures by Central Bank of the Midwest. (Holland, Brian)
July 21, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER granting #9 Joint Motion to Extend Deadlines from Initial Planning and Scheduling Order. The Court grants the joint motion for good cause shown and to allow the parties to continue to work towards a resolution of this matter. The Court resets the scheduling conference in this case for August 10, 2022, at 10:00 a.m., by phone (888-363-4749; access code 5705809). The parties shall submit a proposed scheduling order and copies of their initial disclosures to the Magistrate Judge's chambers at ksd_schwartz_chambers@ksd.uscourts.gov on or before August 3, 2022, consistent with the process outlined in the #6 Initial Order Regarding Planning and Scheduling. Signed by Magistrate Judge Rachel E. Schwartz on 7/21/2022. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (jrh)
July 20, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 Joint MOTION to Amend Scheduling Order by Defendant Nueterra Capital, LLC (referred to Magistrate Judge Rachel E. Schwartz) (Stromberg, Matthew) (Modified on 7/21/2022 to change motion event. (heo))
July 18, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER granting #7 Defendant's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint or Otherwise Plead. The Court grants the motion as unopposed and for good cause shown and extends the deadline for Defendant to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's complaint up to and including August 3, 2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Rachel E. Schwartz on 7/18/2022. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (jrh)
July 18, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by Defendant Nueterra Capital, LLC (referred to Magistrate Judge Rachel E. Schwartz) (Nehrbass, Scott)
June 29, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 INITIAL ORDER REGARDING PLANNING AND SCHEDULING: Scheduling Conference set for August 2, 2022 at 3:00 PM by Telephone (CONFERENCE LINE 1-888-363-4749; ACCESS CODE 5705809) before Magistrate Judge Rachel E. Schwartz. Rule 26 Planning Conference Deadline: 7/13/2022. Rule 26 Initial Disclosures Deadline: 7/22/2022. Proposed Scheduling Order Deadline: 7/22/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Rachel E. Schwartz on 06/29/2022. (drk)
June 29, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 CLERKS ORDER EXTENDING TIME until 7/20/2022 for Defendant Nueterra Capital, LLC to answer or otherwise plead. Signed by deputy clerk on 6/29/2022. (lb)
June 13, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Central Bank of the Midwest identifying None as corporate parent (Struby, Benjamin)
June 13, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ENTRY OF APPEARANCE by Benjamin C. Struby on behalf of Central Bank of the Midwest (Struby, Benjamin)
June 10, 2022 Opinion or Order NOTICE OF JUDGE ASSIGNMENT: Case assigned to District Judge John W. Broomes and Magistrate Judge Rachel E. Schwartz for all proceedings. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (kas)
June 10, 2022 Opinion or Order SUMMONS ISSUED as to Nueterra Capital, LLC. (issued to Attorney for service) (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry) (kas)
June 9, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET by Plaintiff Central Bank of the Midwest. (Holland, Brian)
June 9, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT with trial location of Kansas City (Filing fee $402, Internet Payment Receipt Number AKSDC-5798743.), filed by Central Bank of the Midwest. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D)(Holland, Brian)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Central Bank of the Midwest v. Nueterra Capital, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Central Bank of the Midwest
Represented By: Brian M. Holland
Represented By: Benjamin C. Struby
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Nueterra Capital, LLC
Represented By: Matthew D. Stromberg
Represented By: Scott C. Nehrbass
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?