Prairie Pointe Orthodontics, P.A. v. Ashtel Studios, Inc. et al
| Prairie Pointe Orthodontics, P.A. |
| Ashtel Studios, Inc. doing business as SmartCare and John Does 1-10 |
| 2:2022cv02249 |
| June 26, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Kansas |
| John W Broomes |
| Teresa J James |
| Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) |
| 47 U.S.C. ยง 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 27, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| SUMMONS ISSUED as to Ashtel Studios, Inc. (issued to Attorney for service) (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry) (lb) |
| NOTICE OF JUDGE ASSIGNMENT: Case assigned to District Judge John W. Broomes and Magistrate Judge Teresa J. James for all proceedings. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (lb) |
| Filing 3 DESIGNATION OF PLACE OF TRIAL filed by Plaintiff Prairie Pointe Orthodontics, P.A. - trial to be held in Kansas City. (Fisk, Richard) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET by Plaintiff Prairie Pointe Orthodontics, P.A.. (Fisk, Richard) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with trial location of Kansas City ( Filing fee $402, Internet Payment Receipt Number AKSDC-5809675.), filed by Prairie Pointe Orthodontics, P.A.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)(Fisk, Richard) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
