Marshall v. Leavenworth County, Kansas, Board of County Commissioners
Rodney Marshall |
Leavenworth County, Kansas, Board of County Commissioners doing business as Leavenworth County Public Works |
2:2022cv02257 |
June 29, 2022 |
US District Court for the District of Kansas |
Daniel D Crabtree |
Rachel E Schwartz |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment) |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 26, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 NOTICE OF SERVICE by Leavenworth County, Kansas, Board of County Commissioners of Defendant's Rule 26(a)(1) Initial Disclosures (Holder, Andrew) |
Filing 7 ANSWER to Complaint by Leavenworth County, Kansas, Board of County Commissioners.(Holder, Andrew) |
Filing 6 INITIAL ORDER REGARDING PLANNING AND SCHEDULING: Scheduling Conference set for September 13, 2022 at 3:00 p.m. by telephone (CONFERENCE LINE 1-888-363-4749; ACCESS CODE 5705809) before Magistrate Judge Rachel E. Schwartz. Rule 26 Planning Conference Deadline set for 8/17/2022. Rule 26 Initial Disclosures Deadline set for 8/26/2022. Proposed Scheduling Order Deadline set for 8/26/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Rachel E. Schwartz on 07/22/2022. (drk) |
Filing 5 CLERKS ORDER EXTENDING TIME until 8/08/2022 for Defendant Leavenworth County, Kansas, Board of County Commissioners to answer or otherwise plead. Signed by deputy clerk on 7/22/2022. (jk) |
Filing 4 ENTRY OF APPEARANCE by Andrew D. Holder on behalf of Leavenworth County, Kansas, Board of County Commissioners. (Holder, Andrew) |
Filing 3 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED -- Certified Mail by Rodney Marshall upon Leavenworth County, Kansas, Board of County Commissioners served on 7/2/2022, answer due 7/25/2022 (Bruce, Robert) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET by Plaintiff Rodney Marshall. (Doyle, Daniel) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with trial location of Kansas City (Filing fee $402, Internet Payment Receipt Number BKSDC-5812370.), filed by Rodney Marshall. (Doyle, Daniel) |
SUMMONS ISSUED as to Leavenworth County, Kansas, Board of County Commissioners. (issued to Attorney for service) (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry) (lb) |
NOTICE OF JUDGE ASSIGNMENT: Case assigned to District Judge Daniel D. Crabtree and Magistrate Judge Rachel E. Schwartz for all proceedings. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (lb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Marshall v. Leavenworth County, Kansas, Board of County Commissioners | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Rodney Marshall | |
Represented By: | Noah Ballard |
Represented By: | Robert A. Bruce |
Represented By: | Daniel L. Doyle |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Leavenworth County, Kansas, Board of County Commissioners doing business as Leavenworth County Public Works | |
Represented By: | Andrew D. Holder |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.