Burgess v. Bank of the West
Robert Burgress and Robert Burgess |
Bank of the West |
2:2022cv02284 |
July 21, 2022 |
US District Court for the District of Kansas |
Teresa J James |
Julie A Robinson |
Consumer Credit |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 16, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT by Robert Burgess (Shell, Mandy) |
![]() |
Filing 5 Unopposed MOTION to Correct Misnomer by Plaintiff Robert Burgress (referred to Magistrate Judge Teresa J. James) (Shell, Mandy) |
![]() |
Filing 3 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response as to #1 Complaint (attorney) by Defendant Bank of the West (referred to Magistrate Judge Teresa J. James) (McCurdy, Megan) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET by Plaintiff ROBERT BURGRESS. (Shell, Mandy) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with trial location of Kansas City ( Filing fee $402, Internet Payment Receipt Number AKSDC-5828448.), filed by ROBERT BURGRESS.(Shell, Mandy) |
SUMMONS ISSUED as to Bank of the West (issued to Attorney for service). (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry) (jk) |
NOTICE OF JUDGE ASSIGNMENT: Case assigned to District Judge Julie A. Robinson and Magistrate Judge Teresa J. James for all proceedings. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (jk) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.