Gifford v. Optum Services, Inc.
Lisa Gifford |
Optum Services, Inc. |
2:2022cv02294 |
July 27, 2022 |
US District Court for the District of Kansas |
Angel D Mitchell |
Holly L Teeter |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 28, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 AMENDED JOINT STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE by Lisa Gifford. (Tanner, Henry) |
Civil Case Terminated per #9 /HLT chambers. (mam) |
Filing 9 JOINT STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE by Lisa Gifford. (Tanner, Henry) |
Filing 8 STATUS REPORT REGARDING ARBITRATION by Optum Services, Inc.. (Glickstein, Karen) |
Filing 7 ORDER granting #6 Joint Motion to Stay Proceedings Pending Completion of Arbitration. The parties agree that plaintiff's claims must be submitted to arbitration. Therefore, the court grants the parties' joint motion and stays this action. The parties must file a joint status report by December 9, 2022, and every 90 days thereafter while the case remains in arbitration, and within 14 days of any final arbitration decision. Signed by Magistrate Judge Angel D. Mitchell on 8/9/2022. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (ht) |
Filing 6 Joint MOTION to Stay Case Pending Completion of Arbitration by Defendant Optum Services, Inc. (referred to Magistrate Judge Angel D. Mitchell) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Arbitration Agreement)(Glickstein, Karen) |
Filing 5 CLERKS ORDER EXTENDING TIME until 8/17/2022 for Defendant Optum Services, Inc. to answer or otherwise plead. Signed by deputy clerk on 7/29/2022. (jsh) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Removal to Plaintiff by Optum Services, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Notice of Removal)(Glickstein, Karen) |
Filing 3 DESIGNATION OF PLACE OF TRIAL filed by Defendant Optum Services, Inc. - trial to be held in Kansas City. (Glickstein, Karen) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET by Defendant Optum Services, Inc.. (Glickstein, Karen) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from District Court of Johnson County, case number 22CV03291 Trial location of Kansas City ( Filing fee $402, Internet Payment Receipt Number AKSDC-5832353.), filed by Optum Services, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Documents Filed in the State Court Action)(Glickstein, Karen) |
NOTICE OF JUDGE ASSIGNMENT: Case assigned to District Judge Holly L. Teeter and Magistrate Judge Angel D. Mitchell for all proceedings. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (jsh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Gifford v. Optum Services, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Lisa Gifford | |
Represented By: | Henry W. Tanner, Jr. |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Optum Services, Inc. | |
Represented By: | Karen R. Glickstein |
Represented By: | Ariel Gutovitz |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.