Delap v. United States of America et al
| Bryan Stephen Delap |
| United States of America, Federal Bureau of Investigation, Federal Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives and John Doe |
| 2:2022cv02317 |
| August 11, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Kansas |
| Toby Crouse |
| Rachel E Schwartz |
| Other Statutes: Administrative Procedures Act/Review or Appeal of Agency Decision |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2201 Declaratory Judgement |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 12, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| SUMMONS ISSUED as to Federal Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, Federal Bureau of Investigation, United States of America, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. (issued to Attorney for service) (jsh) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET by Plaintiff Bryan Stephen Delap. (Martin, Richard) |
| Filing 2 DESIGNATION OF PLACE OF TRIAL filed by Plaintiff Bryan Stephen Delap - trial to be held in Kansas City. (Martin, Richard) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with trial location of Kansas City ( Filing fee $402, Internet Payment Receipt Number AKSDC-5843121.), filed by Bryan Stephen Delap.(Martin, Richard) |
| NOTICE OF JUDGE ASSIGNMENT: Case assigned to District Judge Toby Crouse and Magistrate Judge Rachel E. Schwartz for all proceedings. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (jk) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
