Starr Surplus Lines Insurance Company v. UnitedLex Corporation et al
Plaintiff: Starr Surplus Lines Insurance Company
Defendant: UnitedLex Corporation, ULX Manager LLC and ULX Partners, LLC
Case Number: 2:2022cv02318
Filed: August 11, 2022
Court: US District Court for the District of Kansas
Presiding Judge: Rachel E Schwartz
Referring Judge: Kathryn H Vratil
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 2, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 2, 2022 Civil Case Terminated per #6 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal with Prejudice.(mam)
September 2, 2022 Filing 6 NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL by Starr Surplus Lines Insurance Company (Artman, Jennifer)
August 16, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 NOTICE AND ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Show Cause Response due by 9/2/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Rachel E. Schwartz on 8/16/2022. (ca)
August 12, 2022 Filing 4 DESIGNATION OF PLACE OF TRIAL filed by Plaintiff Starr Surplus Lines Insurance Company - trial to be held in Kansas City. (Artman, Jennifer)
August 12, 2022 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY - Designation of place of trial is missing. The filing party/attorney is directed to correct the deficiency immediately. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (jk)
August 12, 2022 NOTICE OF JUDGE ASSIGNMENT: Case assigned to District Judge Kathryn H. Vratil and Magistrate Judge Rachel E. Schwartz for all proceedings. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (jk)
August 11, 2022 Filing 3 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Starr Surplus Lines Insurance Company identifying Starr International Company, Inc. as corporate parent . (Artman, Jennifer)
August 11, 2022 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET by Plaintiff Starr Surplus Lines Insurance Company. (Artman, Jennifer)
August 11, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT with trial location of Kansas City (Filing fee $402, Internet Payment Receipt Number AKSDC-5843230.), filed by Starr Surplus Lines Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E)(Artman, Jennifer)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Starr Surplus Lines Insurance Company v. UnitedLex Corporation et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Starr Surplus Lines Insurance Company
Represented By: Jennifer Jean Artman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: UnitedLex Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ULX Manager LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ULX Partners, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?