Hulsing v. Larimer
Plaintiff: Dennis I. Hulsing
Defendant: Daniel J. Larimer
Case Number: 2:2022cv02362
Filed: September 13, 2022
Court: US District Court for the District of Kansas
Presiding Judge: Toby Crouse
Referring Judge: Rachel E Schwartz
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgement
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 27, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 11, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 10 MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT of #9 MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings by Plaintiff Dennis I. Hulsing(Moore, Stephen)
November 11, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings by Plaintiff Dennis I. Hulsing (Moore, Stephen)
November 11, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ANSWER to #7 Answer to Complaint,, Counterclaim, by Dennis I. Hulsing.(Moore, Stephen)
October 21, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ANSWER to Complaint, Affirmative Defenses AND COUNTERCLAIM against Dennis I. Hulsing by Daniel J. Larimer. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Confessed Judgment Promissory Note, #2 Exhibit 2 - Notice of Default and Acceleration of Confessed Judgment Promissory note)(Struby, Benjamin)
October 7, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 INITIAL ORDER REGARDING PLANNING AND SCHEDULING: Scheduling Conference set for November 15, 2022, at 10:00 a.m. by telephone (CONFERENCE LINE 1-888-363-4749; ACCESS CODE 5705809) before Magistrate Judge Rachel E. Schwartz. Rule 26 Planning Conference Deadline 10/25/2022. Rule 26 Initial Disclosures Deadline set for 11/4/2022. Proposed Scheduling Order Deadline 11/4/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Rachel E. Schwartz on 10/07/2022. (drk)
October 6, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ENTRY OF APPEARANCE by Benjamin C. Struby on behalf of Daniel J. Larimer. (Struby, Benjamin)
October 6, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ENTRY OF APPEARANCE by Jean Paul Bradshaw, II on behalf of Daniel J. Larimer. (Bradshaw, Jean)
September 13, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 DESIGNATION OF PLACE OF TRIAL filed by Plaintiff Dennis I. Hulsing - trial to be held in Kansas City. (Porto, Nicholas)
September 13, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET by Plaintiff Dennis I. Hulsing. (Porto, Nicholas)
September 13, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT with trial location of Kansas City (Filing fee $402, Internet Payment Receipt Number AKSDC-5866062.), filed by Dennis I. Hulsing. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4) (Porto, Nicholas)
September 13, 2022 Opinion or Order NOTICE OF JUDGE ASSIGNMENT: Case assigned to District Judge Toby Crouse and Magistrate Judge Rachel E. Schwartz for all proceedings. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (jk)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hulsing v. Larimer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Dennis I. Hulsing
Represented By: Nicholas J. Porto
Represented By: Stephen J. Moore
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Daniel J. Larimer
Represented By: Benjamin C. Struby
Represented By: Jean Paul Bradshaw, II
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?