Robotzone, LLC v. Wen et al
| Robotzone, LLC |
| Hu Xue Wen an individual dba Yuecoom, Hu Xue Wen an individual doing business as Yuecoom, Wu han zhi xie dian zi shang wu you xian gong si doing business as FASJ, Sichuanhaoyinxiangyinshuazhiban shejiyouxiangongsi doing business as FOLOSAFENAR, Wuhanyiqinghandashujukejiyouxiangongsi doing business as Rosvola Store, John Doe 1, John Doe 1 doing business as Shanrya, John Doe 2 doing business as Wene and Does 3-100 |
| 2:2022cv02380 |
| September 22, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Kansas |
| Toby Crouse |
| Kenneth G Gale |
| Copyright |
| 17 U.S.C. ยง 101 Copyright Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 17, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Does 3-100, John Doe 1, John Doe 2, Sichuanhaoyinxiangyinshuazhiban shejiyouxiangongsi, Hu Xue Wen, Wu han zhi xie dian zi shang wu you xian gong si, Wuhanyiqinghandashujukejiyouxiangongsi, filed by Robotzone, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit List, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D, #6 Exhibit E, #7 Exhibit F, #8 Exhibit G, #9 Exhibit H, #10 Exhibit I, #11 Exhibit J, #12 Exhibit K, #13 Exhibit L, #14 Exhibit M)(Burbach, Cheryl) |
| Filing 8 THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT against John Doe 1, Sichuanhaoyinxiangyinshuazhiban shejiyouxiangongsi, Hu Xue Wen, Wu han zhi xie dian zi shang wu you xian gong si, Wuhanyiqinghandashujukejiyouxiangongsi, filed by Robotzone, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit List, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D, #6 Exhibit E, #7 Exhibit F, #8 Exhibit G, #9 Exhibit H, #10 Exhibit I, #11 Exhibit J, #12 Exhibit K)(Burbach, Cheryl) M |
| Filing 7 SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT against Hu Xue Wen, filed by Robotzone, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit List, #2 Exhibit A - Copyright Reg Nos. 1-475-704, 1-479-801, & 1-479-806, #3 Exhibit B - Copyright Reg No. VAu 1-473-316, #4 Exhibit C - Counter Notice filed 09.13.22, #5 Exhibit D - Counter Notice filed 10.06.22)(Burbach, Cheryl) |
| Filing 6 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against Hu Xue Wen, filed by Robotzone, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit List, #2 Exhibit A - Copyright Reg Nos. 1-475-704, 1-479-801, & 1-479-806, #3 Exhibit B - Copyright Reg No. VAu 1-473-316, #4 Exhibit C - Counter Notice filed 09.13.22, #5 Exhibit D - Counter Notice filed 10.06.22)(Burbach, Cheryl) |
| Filing 5 DESIGNATION OF PLACE OF TRIAL filed by Plaintiff Robotzone, LLC - trial to be held in Kansas City. (Burbach, Cheryl) |
| Filing 4 AO FORM 121: REPORT on the Filing or Determination of an Action or Appeal Regarding a Copyright. (Burbach, Cheryl) |
| NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY - Designation of place of trial and an AO 121 form are missing. Counsel is directed to correct the deficiencies immediately. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (mam) |
| NOTICE OF JUDGE ASSIGNMENT: Case assigned to District Judge Toby Crouse and Magistrate Judge Kenneth G. Gale for all proceedings. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (mam) |
| Filing 3 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Robotzone, LLC identifying None as corporate parent. (Burbach, Cheryl) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET by Plaintiff Robotzone, LLC. (Burbach, Cheryl) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with trial location of Kansas City (Filing fee $402, Internet Payment Receipt Number AKSDC-5874193.), filed by Robotzone, LLC. (Burbach, Cheryl) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
