Capitol Specialty Insurance Company v. Rubelmann et al
| Capitol Specialty Insurance Company |
| Morgan Rubelmann, TFI Family Services, Inc. and Jana Nevins |
| 2:2022cv02405 |
| October 7, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Kansas |
| John W Broomes |
| Angel D Mitchell |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 2, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 16 ANSWER to Complaint , COUNTERCLAIM against Capitol Specialty Insurance Company by Morgan Rubelmann.(Rottinghaus, Thomas) |
| Filing 15 ANSWER to Complaint , COUNTERCLAIM against Capitol Specialty Insurance Company by TFI Family Services, Inc..(O'Flaherty, Vincent) |
| Filing 14 UPDATED CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Capitol Specialty Insurance Company identifying Berkshire Hathaway Inc. as corporate parent. (Moss, Elaine) |
Filing 13
ORDER granting #12 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time in Which to File an Answer or Other Responsive Pleading. Defendant Mogan Rubelmann shall answer or otherwise respond to the complaint by December 5, 2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Angel D. Mitchell on 11/14/2022. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (ht)
|
| Filing 12 UNOPPOSED MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint by Defendant Morgan Rubelmann. (referred to Magistrate Judge Angel D. Mitchell) (Rottinghaus, Thomas) |
|
Filing 11
ORDER granting #9 Unopposed and Stipulated Motion to Extend Time in Which to File and Answer. Defendant TFI Family Services, Inc. shall answer or otherwise respond to the complaint by December 5, 2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Angel D. Mitchell on 11/9/2022. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (amh)
|
| Filing 10 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by TFI Family Services, Inc. identifying None as corporate parent. (O'Flaherty, Vincent) |
| Filing 9 UNOPPOSED AND STIPULATED for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint by Defendant TFI Family Services, Inc. (referred to Magistrate Judge Angel D. Mitchell) (O'Flaherty, Vincent) |
| Filing 8 ENTRY OF APPEARANCE by Vincent F. O'Flaherty on behalf of TFI Family Services, Inc. (O'Flaherty, Vincent) |
| Filing 7 RESPONSE to #6 Answer to Complaint by Plaintiff Capitol Specialty Insurance Company. (Moss, Elaine) |
| Filing 6 ANSWER to Complaint by Jana Nevins. (Rhodes, Randall) |
| Filing 5 ENTRY OF APPEARANCE by Elaine M. Moss on behalf of Capitol Specialty Insurance Company. (Moss, Elaine) |
| Filing 4 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Capitol Specialty Insurance Company identifying Alleghany Corporation as corporate parent. (Moss, Elaine) |
| Filing 3 DESIGNATION OF PLACE OF TRIAL filed by Plaintiff Capitol Specialty Insurance Company - trial to be held in Kansas City. (Moss, Elaine) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET by Plaintiff Capitol Specialty Insurance Company. (Moss, Elaine) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with trial location of Kansas City (Filing fee $402, Internet Payment Receipt Number AKSDC-5885662.), filed by Capitol Specialty Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit - Redacted 1)(Moss, Elaine) |
| NOTICE OF JUDGE ASSIGNMENT: Case assigned to District Judge John W. Broomes and Magistrate Judge Angel D. Mitchell for all proceedings. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (jk) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
