Lake v. United States of America
Bradley Allen Lake |
United States of America |
2:2022cv02441 |
October 31, 2022 |
US District Court for the District of Kansas |
Daniel D Crabtree |
Angel D Mitchell |
Civil Rights: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1343 Violation of Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 5, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 JUDGMENT. Signed by deputy clerk on 12/5/2022. Mailed to pro se party Bradley Allen Lake by regular mail. (ca) |
Filing 8 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER adopting #5 Report and Recommendations. The court dismisses this action under 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) but without prejudice. Signed by District Judge Daniel D. Crabtree on 12/5/2022. Mailed to pro se party Bradley Allen Lake by regular mail. (ca) |
Filing 7 CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT returned re #5 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS and #4 Order, addressed to Bradley Allen Lake. (kas) |
Filing 6 RETURN Mail received re #4 and #5 , addressed to Bradley Allen Lake. Not remailed. (kas) |
NOTICE of Pro Se Mailing: DE #4 & #5 mailed to Bradley Allen Lake on 11/8/2022 by certified mail; Certified Tracking Number 7020 3160 0000 9283 4625. (msb) |
Filing 5 (DUPLICATE FILING OF DE 4) FOR REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: Re #1 Complaint, filed by Bradley Allen Lake. Objections to R&R due by 11/21/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Angel D. Mitchell on 11/4/22. Mailed to pro se party Bradley Allen Lake by regular mail (msb) |
Filing 4 ORDER granting #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge Angel D. Mitchell on 11/4/22. Mailed to pro se party Bradley Allen Lake by regular mail (msb) Modified text on 11/7/2022 (msb). |
Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis NOTE - Access to document is restricted pursuant to the courts privacy policy. by Plaintiff Bradley Allen Lake. (referred to Magistrate Judge Angel D. Mitchell) (Attachments: #1 Financial Affidavit)(kmc) (Additional attachment(s) added on 11/2/2022: #2 page 3) (kas). |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET re #1 Complaint by Plaintiff Bradley Allen Lake. (kmc) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT (No Summons Issued) with trial location of Kansas City, filed by Bradley Allen Lake. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7)(kmc) (Additional attachment(s) added on 11/2/2022: #8 Exhibit A) (kas). |
NOTICE OF JUDGE ASSIGNMENT: Case assigned to District Judge Daniel D. Crabtree and Magistrate Judge Angel D. Mitchell for all proceedings. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (kmc) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Lake v. United States of America | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Bradley Allen Lake | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: United States of America | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.