Cruz v. Cricket Wireless, LLC et al
Plaintiff: Rixy Cruz
Defendant: Cricket Wireless, LLC, BR & E, LLC a limited liability company doing business as DR Wireless doing business as Cricket Wireless Store and Reiad Yacub
Case Number: 2:2022cv02508
Filed: December 8, 2022
Court: US District Court for the District of Kansas
Presiding Judge: Eric F Melgren
Referring Judge: Rachel E Schwartz
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 9, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 9, 2023 Filing 9 STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL by Rixy Cruz. (Barbosa, Marcos)
January 9, 2023 ***Civil Case Terminated per EFM chambers pursuant to #9 Stipulation of Dismissal.(heo)
January 6, 2023 Filing 8 STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL by Rixy Cruz. (Barbosa, Marcos)
December 15, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER granting #6 Unopposed Motion to Stay Case. The Court grants the motion as unopposed with a modification of the requested deadline to account for the federal holiday on January 16, 2023. The Court stays this case up to and including January 17, 2023, to give the parties time to finalize their preliminary settlement agreement and file the appropriate dismissal documents. If dismissal documents are not filed on or before January 17, 2023, then Defendants must answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Complaint (ECF No. 1-4) on or before January 17, 2023. Signed by Magistrate Judge Rachel E. Schwartz on 12/15/2022. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (jrh)
December 14, 2022 Filing 6 Unopposed MOTION to Stay Case by Defendant Cricket Wireless, LLC (referred to Magistrate Judge Rachel E. Schwartz) (Campbell, Stacey)
December 12, 2022 Filing 5 CIVIL COVER SHEET by Defendant Cricket Wireless, LLC. (Campbell, Stacey)
December 9, 2022 Filing 4 DOCKET ANNOTATION: Exhibit A [Doc. 1-1] to #1 Notice of Removal contains personal identifiers prohibited by the Court's privacy policy. This document has been restricted, and a redacted copy has been added to that entry and to this docket annotation for noticing purposes only. (jsh)
December 8, 2022 Filing 3 DESIGNATION OF PLACE OF TRIAL filed by Defendant Cricket Wireless, LLC - trial to be held in Kansas City. (Campbell, Stacey)
December 8, 2022 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET by Defendant Cricket Wireless, LLC. (Campbell, Stacey)
December 8, 2022 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Wyandotte County District Court, case number 2022-CV-000647, trial location of Kansas City (Filing fee $402, Internet Payment Receipt Number AKSDC-5934543.), filed by Cricket Wireless, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Petition for Damages with accompanying exhibits (UNREDACTED; view restricted per security policy), #2 Exhibit B - Motion and Order for Approval and Appointment of Private Process Server, #3 Exhibit C - Motion for Clerk's Extension to File Answer and Limited Entry of Appearance) (Campbell, Stacey) (Additional attachment(s) added on 12/9/2022: #4 Exhibit A - Petition for Damages with accompanying exhibits. (REDACTED)) (jsh) Modified docket text re Exhibit A on 12/9/2022. (jsh)
December 8, 2022 NOTICE OF JUDGE ASSIGNMENT: Case assigned to Chief District Judge Eric F. Melgren and Magistrate Judge Rachel E. Schwartz for all proceedings. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) NOTICE OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE AVAILABILITY: A United States magistrate judge is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action if all parties voluntarily consent. Information & consent forms are available at http://www.uscourts.gov/forms/civil-forms/notice-consent-and-reference-civil-action-magistrate-judge (jsh)
December 8, 2022 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY - 1) Designation of place of trial is missing. 2) Civil cover sheet is missing. The filing party/attorney is directed to correct the deficiency immediately. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (jsh)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Cruz v. Cricket Wireless, LLC et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Rixy Cruz
Represented By: Marcos A. Barbosa
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Cricket Wireless, LLC
Represented By: Stacey Campbell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: BR & E, LLC a limited liability company doing business as DR Wireless doing business as Cricket Wireless Store
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Reiad Yacub
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?