Boyle v. Bohm Farm & Ranch, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Brent Boyle
Defendant: Bohm Farm & Ranch, Inc. and Peter bohm
Case Number: 2:2022cv02513
Filed: December 9, 2022
Court: US District Court for the District of Kansas
Presiding Judge: Teresa J James
Referring Judge: Holly L Teeter
Nature of Suit: Labor: Fair Standards
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 6, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 6, 2023 Filing 8 NOTICE OF SERVICE by Peter Bohm, Bohm Farm & Ranch, Inc. of Initial Disclosures (Michel, Larry)
February 1, 2023 Filing 7 NOTICE OF SERVICE by Brent Boyle of Rule 26 Disclosures and Documents (Pospisil, Michael)
January 31, 2023 Filing 6 NOTICE OF SERVICE by Peter Bohm, Bohm Farm & Ranch, Inc. of Discovery Requests (Michel, Larry)
January 6, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 5 INITIAL ORDER REGARDING PLANNING AND SCHEDULING: Scheduling Conference set for 2/15/2023 at 10:00 AM by Telephone before Magistrate Judge Teresa J. James. Participants must dial CONFERENCE LINE 1-888-363-4749 and enter ACCESS CODE 4901386 to join the conference. Rule 26 Planning Conference deadline 1/27/2023. Rule 26 Initial Disclosures and Proposed Scheduling Order due 2/6/2023. Signed by Magistrate Judge Teresa J. James on 1/6/2023. (byk)
January 5, 2023 Filing 4 ANSWER to Complaint by Peter Bohm, Bohm Farm & Ranch, Inc..(Michel, Larry)
December 13, 2022 Filing 3 ENTRY OF APPEARANCE by Larry G. Michel on behalf of All Defendants (Michel, Larry)
December 12, 2022 NOTICE OF JUDGE ASSIGNMENT: Case assigned to District Judge Holly L. Teeter and Magistrate Judge Teresa J. James for all proceedings. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) NOTICE OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE AVAILABILITY: A United States magistrate judge is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action if all parties voluntarily consent. Information & consent forms are available at http://www.uscourts.gov/forms/civil-forms/notice-consent-and-reference-civil-action-magistrate-judge (kmc)
December 9, 2022 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET by Plaintiff Brent Boyle. (Pospisil, Michael)
December 9, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT with trial location of Kansas City (Filing fee $402, Internet Payment Receipt Number AKSDC-5935593.), filed by Brent Boyle. (Pospisil, Michael)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Boyle v. Bohm Farm & Ranch, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Brent Boyle
Represented By: Michael D. Pospisil
Represented By: Matthew T. Swift
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Bohm Farm & Ranch, Inc.
Represented By: Larry G. Michel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Peter bohm
Represented By: Larry G. Michel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?