Ward v. QuikTrip Corporation et al
| Thomas Ward |
| QuikTrip Store #249 and QuikTrip Corporation |
| 2:2022cv02536 |
| December 27, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Kansas |
| John W Broomes |
| Angel D Mitchell |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 7, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE of Disclosures Pursuant to Federal Rule 26(a)(1) by QuikTrip Corporation. (Nye, Brian) |
| Filing 14 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE of Plaintiff's answers and objections to Defendant's first Interrogatories and Document requests to Plaintiff by Thomas Ward. (Gray, Gerald) |
| Filing 13 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE of Objections and Answers to Plaintiff's First Interrogatories and Objections and Responses to Plaintiff's First Requests for Production by QuikTrip Corporation. (Nye, Brian) |
Filing 12
INITIAL ORDER REGARDING PLANNING AND SCHEDULING: Scheduling Conference set for 2/28/2023 at 11:00 AM in Telephone ADM - CONFERENCE LINE 1-888-363-4749 ACCESS CODE 3977627 before Magistrate Judge Angel D. Mitchell. Rule 26 Planning Conference Deadline 2/7/2023. Rule 26 Initial Disclosures Deadline set for 2/17/2023. Proposed Scheduling Order Deadline 2/17/2023. Signed by Magistrate Judge Angel D. Mitchell on 1/24/2023. (ht) (Main Document 12 replaced on 1/24/2023) (ht).
|
| Filing 11 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE of Plaintiff's Opening Discovery to Defendant by Thomas Ward. (Gray, Gerald) |
| Filing 10 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE of First Interrogatories and First Request for Production of Documents. by QuikTrip Corporation. (Nye, Brian) |
| Filing 9 AMENDED ANSWER to Complaint by QuikTrip Corporation. (Nye, Brian) |
| Filing 8 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED -- Defendant QuikTrip Store #249 (CT Corporation System) served 9/21/2022. (Originally filed in the Johnson County District Court on 9/28/2022.) (mam) |
| Filing 7 PROOF of Filing Notice of Removal in State Court by QuikTrip Corporation re #1 Notice of Removal. (Nye, Brian) |
| Filing 6 ENTRY OF APPEARANCE by Karrie J. Clinkinbeard on behalf of QuikTrip Corporation. (Clinkinbeard, Karrie) |
| Filing 5 ANSWER to Complaint by QuikTrip Corporation. (Nye, Brian) |
| Filing 4 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by QuikTrip Corporation identifying None as corporate parent. (Nye, Brian) |
| Filing 3 DESIGNATION OF PLACE OF TRIAL filed by Defendant QuikTrip Corporation - trial to be held in Kansas City. (Nye, Brian) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET by Defendant QuikTrip Corporation. (Nye, Brian) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from District Court of Johnson County, Kansas, case number 22CV04528, trial location of Kansas City (Filing fee $402, Internet Payment Receipt Number AKSDC-5946264), filed by QuikTrip Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - State Court Records, #2 Exhibit B - Affidavit of Marshall Wells) (Nye, Brian) |
| NOTICE OF JUDGE ASSIGNMENT: Case assigned to District Judge John W. Broomes and Magistrate Judge Angel D. Mitchell for all proceedings. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) NOTICE OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE AVAILABILITY: A United States magistrate judge is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action if all parties voluntarily consent. Information & consent forms are available at http://www.uscourts.gov/forms/civil-forms/notice-consent-and-reference-civil-action-magistrate-judge (jsh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
