Dubuc v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc. et al
| Kenneth Dubuc |
| Experian Information Solutions, Inc., TransUnion Consumer Solutions, LLC, Equifax Information Services, LLC and TD Retail Card Services |
| 2:2023cv02016 |
| January 17, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Kansas |
| Daniel D Crabtree |
| Rachel E Schwartz |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 26, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 34 STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL of Defendant Equifax by Kenneth Dubuc. (Addleman, Thomas) |
| Filing 33 STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL with Defendant Experian by Kenneth Dubuc. (Addleman, Thomas) |
| ***Civil Case Terminated per chambers and #34 Stipulation of Dismissal.(ca) |
Filing 32
ORDER granting (ECF No. 31) Motion for Extension of Time to File Dismissal Documents. The Court grants the motion and orders that on or before July 28, 2023, the parties must file dismissal papers regarding Defendants Experian Information Solutions, Inc. and Equifax Information Services, LLC. Signed by Magistrate Judge Rachel E. Schwartz on 7/20/2023. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (jrh)
|
| Filing 31 Motion for Extension of Time to File Dismissal Documents. In response to a July 19, 2023 email from the Magistrate Judge's chambers, counsel for Plaintiff requested an extension until July 28, 2023, to file dismissal documents regarding Defendants Experian Information Solutions, Inc. and Equifax Information Services, LLC. For clarity of the docket, the Court will treat this request as a motion to modify the deadlines in ECF Nos. 23 and 29. (referred to Magistrate Judge Rachel E. Schwartz) (jrh) |
| Filing 30 NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL OF APPEARANCE by attorney Nicolette C. Rodriguez as to Equifax Information Services, LLC. (Rodriguez, Nicolette) |
|
Filing 29
ORDER regarding #28 Notice of Settlement with Defendant Equifax Information Services, LLC. According to the Notice of Settlement, Plaintiff has reached a settlement in this case with Defendant Equifax Information Services, LLC. In response to a June 6, 2023 email from the Court, counsel for Plaintiff requested 45 days, or until July 21, 2023, to file the dismissal papers. The Court therefore orders the parties to file dismissal papers regarding Equifax Information Services, LLC on or before July 21, 2023. Because Plaintiff now has filed a notice of settlement with every Defendant in this case, the Court also suspends all deadlines and hearings in the #27 Initial Order Regarding Planning and Scheduling, including the June 27, 2023 Scheduling Conference. Signed by Magistrate Judge Rachel E. Schwartz on 6/8/2023. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.)(jrh)
|
| Filing 28 NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT with Defendant Equifax Information Services, LLC by Kenneth Dubuc. (Addleman, Thomas) |
|
Filing 27
INITIAL ORDER REGARDING PLANNING AND SCHEDULING: Scheduling Conference set for June 27, 2023, at 3:00 p.m. by telephone (CONFERENCE LINE 1-888-363-4749; ACCESS CODE 5705809) before Magistrate Judge Rachel E. Schwartz. Rule 26 Planning Conference Deadline 6/6/2023. Rule 26 Initial Disclosures Deadline set for 6/16/2023. Proposed Scheduling Order Deadline 6/16/2023. Signed by Magistrate Judge Rachel E. Schwartz on 05/26/2023. (drk)
|
| Filing 26 ENTRY OF APPEARANCE by Nicolette Carmen Rodriguez on behalf of Equifax Information Services, LLC. (Rodriguez, Nicolette) |
| Filing 25 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Equifax Information Services, LLC identifying Equifax Inc. as corporate parent . (Zeeck, Phillip) |
| Filing 24 ANSWER to Complaint by Equifax Information Services, LLC.(Zeeck, Phillip) |
|
Filing 23
ORDER regarding #21 Notice of Settlement with Defendant Experian Information Solutions, Inc. According to the Notice of Settlement, Plaintiff has reached a settlement in this case with Defendant Experian Information Solutions, Inc. In response to a May 19, 2023 email from the Court, counsel for Plaintiff requested 60 days, or until July 18, 2023, to file the dismissal papers. The Court therefore orders the parties to file dismissal papers regarding Defendant Experian Information Solutions, Inc. on or before July 18, 2023. The Court suspends all other remaining deadlines related to Experian Information Solutions, Inc. only. Any other deadlines for Plaintiff and the remaining Defendant, Equifax Information Services, LLC, remain unchanged. Signed by Magistrate Judge Rachel E. Schwartz on 5/19/2023. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.)(jrh)
|
| Filing 22 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED -- certified mail by Kenneth Dubuc upon Equifax Information Services, LLC served on 3/1/2023, answer due 3/22/2023 (Addleman, Thomas) |
| Filing 21 NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT with Defendant Experian by Kenneth Dubuc (Addleman, Thomas) |
|
Filing 20
ORDER regarding #19 Response to Order to Show Cause. The Magistrate Judge previously ordered Plaintiff to show cause why Plaintiff's claims against Defendants Experian Information Solutions, Inc. and Equifax Information Services, LLC should not be dismissed for failure to serve pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m). In Plaintiff's #19 response, Plaintiff requests the Court grant him a 60-day extension of time to serve Defendants. The Court does not find good cause for the wholesale extension that Plaintiff seeks, but does find good cause for a brief extension of the deadline to serve Defendants. In its discretion, the Court will grant Plaintiff a permissive extension of time to serve Defendants Experian Information Solutions, Inc. and Equifax Information Services, LLC to up to and including June 5, 2023. As such, the Court will not recommend dismissal at this time, but warns Plaintiff that failure to timely and properly serve Defendants within the permitted extension may result in the Magistrate Judge recommending dismissal of the remaining Defendants in this case. Signed by Magistrate Judge Rachel E. Schwartz on 5/16/2023. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.)(jrh)
|
| Filing 19 RESPONSE to Order to Show Cause by Plaintiff Kenneth Dubuc. (Addleman, Thomas) |
| Filing 18 STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL of Defendant Trans Union Only by Kenneth Dubuc. (Addleman, Thomas) |
|
Filing 17
ORDER regarding #13 Notice and Order to Show Cause. On April 25, 2023, Plaintiff was ordered to show cause in writing by May 9, 2023, why the Court should not recommend that the District Judge dismiss Plaintiff's claims against Defendants Experian Information Solutions, Inc. and Equifax Information Services, LLC without prejudice pursuant to Rule 4(m). Plaintiff failed to timely respond to the Court's Order to Show Cause. On or before May 15, 2023, Plaintiff must either file a response to the Court's Order to Show Cause or proof of service on the aforementioned Defendants. Otherwise, the undersigned Magistrate Judge will file a Report and Recommendation to the District Judge recommending dismissal of Plaintiff's claims without prejudice for failure to serve pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m). Signed by Magistrate Judge Rachel E. Schwartz on 5/11/2023. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.)(jrh)
|
| Filing 16 STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL with Defendant TD Retail Card Services by Kenneth Dubuc. (Addleman, Thomas) |
|
Filing 15
ORDER regarding #14 Notice of Settlement with Defendant TD Retail Card Services. According to the Notice of Settlement, Plaintiff has reached a settlement in this case with Defendant TD Retail Card Services, a division of TD Bank, N.A. In response to an April 27, 2023 email from the Court, counsel for Plaintiff requested 45 days, or until June 15, 2023, to file the dismissal papers. The Court therefore orders the parties to file dismissal papers regarding Defendant TD Retail Card Services on or before June 15, 2023. The Court suspends all other remaining deadlines related to TD Retail Card Services only, including its May 10, 2023 deadline to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's complaint. All other deadlines for Plaintiff and the remaining Defendants remain unchanged, including Plaintiff's deadline to respond to the Court's #13 Notice and Order to Show Cause. Signed by Magistrate Judge Rachel E. Schwartz on 4/27/2023. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.)(jrh)
|
| Filing 14 NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT with Defendant TD Retail Card Services by Kenneth Dubuc (Addleman, Thomas) |
|
Filing 13
NOTICE AND ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE - The Court orders Plaintiff to show cause in writing by May 9, 2023, why the Court should not recommend that the District Judge dismiss Plaintiff's claims against Defendants Experian Information Solutions, Inc. and Equifax Information Services, LLC without prejudice pursuant to Rule 4(m). Signed by Magistrate Judge Rachel E. Schwartz on 4/25/2023. (ca)
|
|
Filing 12
ORDER granting #10 Joint Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer. The Court grants the joint motion and directs TD Retail Card Services, a division of TD Bank, N.A., to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's complaint to on or before May 10, 2023. Signed by Magistrate Judge Rachel E. Schwartz on 4/6/2023. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (jrh)
|
| Filing 11 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by TD Retail Card Services identifying TD Bank US Holding Company as corporate parent (Wohlford, Lucas) |
| Filing 10 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by Defendant TD Retail Card Services (referred to Magistrate Judge Rachel E. Schwartz) (Wohlford, Lucas) |
|
Filing 9
ORDER granting #6 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer. The Court grants the motion as unopposed and directs Defendant TransUnion Consumer Solutions, LLC to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's complaint on or before May 1, 2023. Although the motion states that this is the second request for an extension of this deadline, the Court granted TransUnion Consumer Solutions, LLC two previous extensions of this same deadline. ECF Nos. 5, 7. The Court is unlikely to grant another extension of this deadline. Moreover, counsel are reminded of D. Kan. Rule 6.1(a), which requires that all motions for an extension of time must be filed no less than 3 days before the deadline. Failure to comply with this Rule may result in the denial of any future motions. Signed by Magistrate Judge Rachel E. Schwartz on 3/31/2023. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (jrh)
|
| Filing 8 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer of Defendant Trans Union by Plaintiff Kenneth Dubuc (referred to Magistrate Judge Rachel E. Schwartz) (Addleman, Thomas) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER granting #6 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer. The Court grants the motion as unopposed and directs Defendant TransUnion Consumer Solutions, LLC to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's complaint on or before March 31, 2023. Although the motion states that this is the first request for an extension of this deadline, the Court granted a previous extension of this same deadline. ECF No. 5. Signed by Magistrate Judge Rachel E. Schwartz on 3/2/2023. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (jrh)
|
| Filing 6 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer of Defendant TransUnion by Plaintiff Kenneth Dubuc (referred to Magistrate Judge Rachel E. Schwartz) (Addleman, Thomas) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER granting #4 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer. The Court grants the motion as unopposed and directs Defendant TransUnion Consumer Solutions, LLC to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's complaint on or before March 6, 2023. Signed by Magistrate Judge Rachel E. Schwartz on 2/13/2023. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (jrh)
|
| Filing 4 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer for Trans Union to Answer by Plaintiff Kenneth Dubuc (referred to Magistrate Judge Rachel E. Schwartz) (Addleman, Thomas) |
| Filing 3 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Kenneth Dubuc. TD Retail Card Services waiver sent on 2/7/2023, answer due 4/10/2023. (Addleman, Thomas) |
| SUMMONS ISSUED as to Equifax Information Services, LLC, Experian Information Solutions, Inc., TD Retail Card Services, TransUnion Consumer Solutions, LLC (issued to Attorney for service). Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge Form provided to counsel for service with complaint. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry) (jk) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET by Plaintiff Kenneth Dubuc. (Addleman, Thomas) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with trial location of Kansas City (Filing fee $402, Internet Payment Receipt Number AKSDC-5961175.), filed by Kenneth Dubuc.(Addleman, Thomas) |
| NOTICE OF JUDGE ASSIGNMENT: Case assigned to District Judge Daniel D. Crabtree and Magistrate Judge Rachel E. Schwartz for all proceedings. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) NOTICE OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE AVAILABILITY: A United States magistrate judge is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action if all parties voluntarily consent. Information & consent forms are available at http://www.uscourts.gov/forms/civil-forms/notice-consent-and-reference-civil-action-magistrate-judge (jk) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
