G4 Innovations LLC v. PACCAR, Inc.
Plaintiff: G4 Innovations LLC
Defendant: PACCAR Inc and PACCAR, Inc.
Case Number: 2:2023cv02271
Filed: June 15, 2023
Court: US District Court for the District of Kansas
Presiding Judge: Angel D Mitchell
Referring Judge: Holly L Teeter
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 8, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 26, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 11 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED -- Personal Service by G4 Innovations LLC upon PACCAR, Inc. served on 6/28/2023, answer due 8/18/2023 (Marcus, David)
July 10, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER granting #9 Defendant's Unopposed Motion Regarding PACCAR Inc's Time to Answer, Move, or Otherwise Respond to Plaintiff's Class Action Complaint. Defendant PACCAR Inc has until August 18, 2023, to file its answer or otherwise respond to plaintiff's complaint. Signed by Magistrate Judge Angel D. Mitchell on 7/10/2023. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (ht)
July 7, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 9 UNOPPOSED MOTION Regarding Defendant's Time to Answer, Move, or Otherwise Respond to Plaintiff's Class Action Complaint by Defendant PACCAR, Inc. (Motion referred to Magistrate Judge Angel D. Mitchell.) (Middleton, Marc)
July 7, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER granting #5 , #6 and #7 Motions to Appear Pro Hac Vice of Anthony Michael Pisciotti, Clifford Mark Laney and Danny Charles Lallis for PACCAR, Inc. pursuant to D. Kan. Rule 83.5.4 for purposes of this case only. Signed by Magistrate Judge Angel D. Mitchell on 7/7/2023. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (ht)
July 6, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 7 MOTION for attorney Danny Charles Lallis to appear pro hac vice (Pro hac vice fee $50, Internet Payment Receipt Number AKSDC-6099815.) by Defendant PACCAR, Inc. (Motion referred to Magistrate Judge Angel D. Mitchell.) (Attachments: #1 Lallis Affidavit, #2 ECF Registration Form)(Middleton, Marc)
July 6, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 6 MOTION for attorney Clifford Mark Laney to appear pro hac vice (Pro hac vice fee $50, Internet Payment Receipt Number AKSDC-6099784.) by Defendant PACCAR, Inc. (Motion referred to Magistrate Judge Angel D. Mitchell.) (Attachments: #1 Laney Affidavit, #2 ECF Registration Form)(Middleton, Marc)
July 6, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 5 MOTION for attorney Anthony Michael Pisciotti to appear pro hac vice (Pro hac vice fee $50, Internet Payment Receipt Number AKSDC-6099754.) by Defendant PACCAR, Inc. (Motion referred to Magistrate Judge Angel D. Mitchell.) (Attachments: #1 Pisciotti Affidavit, #2 ECF Registration Form)(Middleton, Marc)
July 6, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ENTRY OF APPEARANCE by Marc N. Middleton on behalf of PACCAR, Inc. (Middleton, Marc)
June 26, 2023 Opinion or Order SUMMONS ISSUED as to PACCAR, Inc. (issued to Attorney for service). Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge Form provided to counsel for service with complaint. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry) (jk)
June 16, 2023 Opinion or Order NOTICE OF JUDGE ASSIGNMENT: Case assigned to District Judge Holly L. Teeter and Magistrate Judge Angel D. Mitchell for all proceedings. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) NOTICE OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE AVAILABILITY: A United States magistrate judge is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action if all parties voluntarily consent. Information & consent forms are available at http://www.uscourts.gov/forms/civil-forms/notice-consent-and-reference-civil-action-magistrate-judge (jk)
June 15, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 3 DESIGNATION OF PLACE OF TRIAL filed by Plaintiff G4 Innovations LLC - trial to be held in Kansas City. (Marcus, David)
June 15, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET by Plaintiff G4 Innovations LLC. (Marcus, David)
June 15, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT with trial location of Kansas City (Filing fee $402, Internet Payment Receipt Number AKSDC-6085732.), filed by G4 Innovations LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Marcus, David)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: G4 Innovations LLC v. PACCAR, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: G4 Innovations LLC
Represented By: David L Marcus
Represented By: Benjamin B. Donovan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: PACCAR Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: PACCAR, Inc.
Represented By: Anthony Michael Pisciotti
Represented By: Clifford Mark Laney
Represented By: Danny Charles Lallis
Represented By: Marc N. Middleton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?