Shands v. H&R Block, Inc.
Robert Edward Shands |
H&R Block, Inc. |
2:2023cv02298 |
July 5, 2023 |
US District Court for the District of Kansas |
John W Broomes |
Angel D Mitchell |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
29 U.S.C. ยง 621 Job Discrimination (Age) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 8, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 ORDER granting #6 Joint Motion to Stay Proceedings Pending Arbitration. The parties agree that plaintiff's claims must be submitted to arbitration. Therefore, the court grants the parties' joint motion and stays this action. The parties must file a joint status report by November 8, 2023, and every 90 days thereafter while the case remains in arbitration, and within 14 days of any final arbitration decision. Signed by Magistrate Judge Angel D. Mitchell on 8/8/2023. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (ht) |
Filing 6 STIPULATION AND JOINT MOTION to Stay Proceeding Pending Arbitration by H&R Block, Inc. (Reisdorff, Kerri) Modified on 8/8/2023 to re-title. (mam) |
Filing 5 CLERKS ORDER EXTENDING TIME until 08/15/2023 for Defendant H&R Block, Inc. to answer or otherwise plead. Signed by deputy clerk on 07/18/2023. (nao) |
Filing 4 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED -- Certified Mail by Robert Edward Shands upon H&R Block, Inc. served on 7/11/2023, answer due 8/1/2023. (jsh) |
Filing 3 DOCKET ANNOTATION: Plaintiff Robert Edward Shands is a registered pro se participant with ECF notifications only. (gw) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET re #1 Complaint by Plaintiff Robert Edward Shands. (jsh) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT (Summons Issued) with trial location of Kansas City, filed by Robert Edward Shands. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit: Right to Sue letter) (jsh) |
SUMMONS ISSUED as to H&R Block, Inc. (issued to Returned to plaintiff for service). Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge Form provided to counsel for service with complaint. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry) (jsh) |
NOTICE OF JUDGE ASSIGNMENT: Case assigned to District Judge John W. Broomes and Magistrate Judge Angel D. Mitchell for all proceedings. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) NOTICE OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE AVAILABILITY: A United States magistrate judge is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action if all parties voluntarily consent. Information & consent forms are available at http://www.uscourts.gov/forms/civil-forms/notice-consent-and-reference-civil-action-magistrate-judge (jsh) |
FILING FEE PAID: in the amount of $ 402.00, receipt number 200000798. (jsh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Shands v. H&R Block, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Robert Edward Shands | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: H&R Block, Inc. | |
Represented By: | Kerri S. Reisdorff |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.