Bretto et al v. AMC Entertainment Holdings, Inc.
| Jasmine Bretto and Naomi Kopinsky |
| AMC Entertainment Holdings, Inc. |
| 2:2023cv02317 |
| July 19, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Kansas |
| Daniel D Crabtree |
| Angel D Mitchell |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 14, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 17
ORDER granting #16 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice of Tara D. Kennedy for AMC Entertainment Holdings, Inc. pursuant to D. Kan. Rule 83.5.4 for purposes of this case only. Signed by Magistrate Judge Angel D. Mitchell on 9/14/2023. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (ht)
|
| Filing 16 MOTION for attorney Tara D. Kennedy to appear pro hac vice ( Pro hac vice fee $50, Internet Payment Receipt Number AKSDC-6153493.) by Defendant AMC Entertainment Holdings, Inc. (referred to Magistrate Judge Angel D. Mitchell) (Attachments: #1 ECF Registration Form Tara D. Kennedy ECF Registration Form)(Gadberry, Anna) |
|
Filing 15
ORDER granting #13 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice of Matthew C. Wolfe for AMC Entertainment Holdings, Inc. pursuant to D. Kan. Rule 83.5.4 for purposes of this case only. Signed by Magistrate Judge Angel D. Mitchell on 9/12/2023. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (ht)
|
| Filing 14 CLERKS ORDER EXTENDING TIME until 10/02/2023 for Defendant AMC Entertainment Holdings, Inc. to answer or otherwise plead. Signed by deputy clerk on 9/11/2023. (jk) |
| Filing 13 MOTION for attorney Matthew C. Wolfe to appear pro hac vice ( Pro hac vice fee $50, Internet Payment Receipt Number AKSDC-6149726.) by Defendant AMC Entertainment Holdings, Inc. (referred to Magistrate Judge Angel D. Mitchell) (Attachments: #1 ECF Registration Form Matthew C. Wolfe ECF Form)(Gadberry, Anna) |
| Filing 12 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by AMC Entertainment Holdings, Inc. identifying None as corporate parent (Gadberry, Anna) |
| Filing 11 ENTRY OF APPEARANCE by Anna A. Gadberry on behalf of AMC Entertainment Holdings, Inc. (Gadberry, Anna) |
|
Filing 10
ORDER granting #9 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice of Sophia M. Rios for Jasmine Bretto and Naomi Kopinsky pursuant to D. Kan. Rule 83.5.4 for purposes of this case only. Signed by Magistrate Judge Angel D. Mitchell on 8/25/2023. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (ht)
|
| Filing 9 MOTION for attorney Sophia M. Rios to appear pro hac vice (Pro hac vice fee $50, Internet Payment Receipt Number AKSDC-6137502.) by Plaintiffs Jasmine Bretto, Naomi Kopinsky. (Motion referred to Magistrate Judge Angel D. Mitchell.) (Attachments: #1 Affidavit of Sophia M. Rios, #2 ECF Registration Form)(Sinclair, Paul) |
| Filing 8 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Jasmine Bretto, Naomi Kopinsky. AMC Entertainment Holdings, Inc. waiver sent on 7/20/2023, answer due 9/18/2023. (Sinclair, Paul) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER granting #5 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice of Lane L. Vines for Jasmine Bretto and Naomi Kopinsky pursuant to D. Kan. Rule 83.5.4 for purposes of this case only. Signed by Magistrate Judge Angel D. Mitchell on 7/26/2023. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (ht)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER granting #4 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice of Sherrie R. Savett for Jasmine Bretto and Naomi Kopinsky pursuant to D. Kan. Rule 83.5.4 for purposes of this case only. Signed by Magistrate Judge Angel D. Mitchell on 7/26/2023. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (ht)
|
| Filing 5 MOTION for attorney Lane L. Vines to appear pro hac vice (Pro hac vice fee $50, Internet Payment Receipt Number AKSDC-6114340.) by Plaintiffs Jasmine Bretto, Naomi Kopinsky. (Motion referred to Magistrate Judge Angel D. Mitchell.) (Attachments: #1 Affidavit of Lane L. Vines, #2 ECF Registration Form)(Sinclair, Paul) |
| Filing 4 MOTION for attorney Sherrie R. Savett to appear pro hac vice (Pro hac vice fee $50, Internet Payment Receipt Number AKSDC-6114329.) by Plaintiffs Jasmine Bretto, Naomi Kopinsky. (Motion referred to Magistrate Judge Angel D. Mitchell.) (Attachments: #1 Affidavit of Sherrie R. Savett, #2 ECF Registration Form)(Sinclair, Paul) |
| Filing 3 DESIGNATION OF PLACE OF TRIAL filed by Plaintiffs Jasmine Bretto, Naomi Kopinsky - trial to be held in Kansas City. (Sinclair, Paul) |
| NOTICE OF JUDGE ASSIGNMENT: Case assigned to District Judge Daniel D. Crabtree and Magistrate Judge Angel D. Mitchell for all proceedings. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) NOTICE OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE AVAILABILITY: A United States magistrate judge is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action if all parties voluntarily consent. Information & consent forms are available at http://www.uscourts.gov/forms/civil-forms/notice-consent-and-reference-civil-action-magistrate-judge (jk) |
| NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY - Designation of place of trial is missing. The filing party/attorney is directed to correct the deficiency immediately. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (jk) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET by Plaintiffs Jasmine Bretto, Naomi Kopinsky. (Sinclair, Paul) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with trial location of Kansas City (Filing fee $402, Internet Payment Receipt Number BKSDC-6109299.), filed by Jasmine Bretto, Naomi Kopinsky. (Sinclair, Paul) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
